Students in the first-year legal writing program at Suffolk University Law School this year will get free licenses to WordRake, a legal editing and proofreading add-in for Microsoft Word and Outlook designed for lawyers and other legal professionals.
Suffolk’s legal writing program ranked third best in the nation in the U.S. News & World Report 2020 Best Law Schools Guide. The program’s director, Kathleen Elliott Vinson, said that WordRake is helpful to students because it requires...
Daniel M. Klerman (University of Southern California Gould School of Law) and Holger Spamann (University of Southern California Gould School of Law) have published "Law Matters -- Less Than We Thought" on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
In a pre-registered 2×2×2 factorial between-subject randomized lab experiment with 61 federal judges, we test if the law influences judicial decisions, if it does so more under a rule than under a standard, and how its influence compares to that...
We introduce the theoretical principles that underlie the design of a software tool which could be used by judges for making decisions about litigations and for writing judgements. The tool is based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDD), which are graphical representations of truth–valued functions associated to propositional formulas. Given a type of litigation, the tool asks questions to the judge; each question is represented by a propositional atom. Their answers, true or false, allow to evaluate...
Do you have to be so obsessively focused to be great? The traditional masculine answer is yes. But probably the right answer is no.
In the first place, being monomaniacal may not even be good for your work. Another book on my summer reading list was “Range,” by David Epstein. It’s a powerful argument that generalists perform better than specialists. ...
He shows the same pattern in domain after domain: People who specialize in one thing succeed early, but then they slide back to mediocrity...
I have been totally remiss in singing the praises of Michael’s new article coming out shortly in the University of Chicago Law Reviewand now, as I am getting ready for class and rereading it, I want to recommend it even more. It’s wonderful empirical work–both creative and comprehensive–with a real impact for what lawyers should know and policy-makers should find troubling. I’ll be teaching this in both my ADR and Ethics classes. Here is the link. And here...