Marjorie Corman Aaron, ADR Toolbox: The Highwire Art of Evaluation, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 62 (1996).
Marjorie Corman Aaron, Do’s and Don’ts for Mediation Practice, 11 NO. 2 Disp. Resol. Mag. 19 (2005).
Marjorie Corman Aaron, A Mediator’s Soliloquy, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 63 (1996).
Marjorie C. Aaron, The Value of Decision Analysis in Mediation Practice, 11 Neg. J. 123 (1995).
Marjorie Corman Aaron & David P. Hoffer, Using Decision Trees As Tools for Settlement, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 71 (1996).
Kenneth J. Aarow, Information Acquisition and the Resolution of Conflict, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution 259 (Kenneth J. Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Steve Abernethy, Building Large-Scale Online Dispute Resolution & Trustmark Systems, Proceedings of the UNECE Forum on ODR (2003).
Harold I. Abramson, Problem-Solving Advocacy in Mediations: A Model of Client Representation, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 103 (2005).
Harold I. Abramson, Problem-Solving Advocacy in Mediations, 59-OCT Disp. Resol. J. 56 (2004).
Bill Adler, How to Negotiate Like a Child: Unleash the Little Monster Within to Get Everything You Want (2006).
Matthew D. Adler & Eric A. Posner, New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis (2006).
Robert S. Adler, Flawed Thinking: Addressing Decision Bias in Negotiation, 20 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 683 (2005).
Robert S. Adler & Elliot M. Silverstein, When David Meets Goliath: Dealing with Power Differentials in Negotiations, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2000).
Kathryn Monahan Ainsworth, Alternative Dispute Resolution for Commercial Cases, 16 Me. B.J. 226 (2001).
George A. Akerlof, The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q.J. Econ 488 (1970).
Nadja Alexander, Mobile Mediation: How Technology is Driving the Globalization of ADR, 27 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 243 (2006).
Alejandro E. Almaguer & Roland Baggott III, Shaping New Legal Frontiers: Dispute Resolution for the Internet, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 711 (1998).
Michal Alberstein, Forms of Mediation and Law: Cultures of Dispute Resolution, 22 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 321 (2007).
Janet Cooper Alexander, Do the Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Action, 43 Stan. L. Rev. 497 (1991).
James J. Alfini & Eric Galton, ADR Personalities and Practice Tips (1998).
James J. Alfini, Should Lawyer-Mediators Be Prohibited from Providing Legal Advice or Evaluations?, Disp. Resol. Mag., Spring 1994, at 8.
James J. Alfini, Summary Jury Trials in State and Federal Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Perceptions of Participating Lawyers, 4 Ohio St. J. on Dispute Resol. 213 (1989).
James J. Alfini, Trashing, Bashing, and Hashing It Out: Is This the End of “Good Mediation”?, 19 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 47 (1991).
Michal Albertstein, Forms of Medation and Law: Cultures of Dispute Resolution, 22 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 321 (2007).
Alejandro E. Almaguer & Roland W. Baggott III, Shaping New Legal Frontiers: Dispute Resolution for the Internet, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 711 (1998).
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Setting Yourself Apart from the Herd: A Judge’s Thoughts on Successful Courtroom Advocacy, 50 S.C. L. Rev. 617, 618 (1999)
Jennifer Arlen, Matthew Spitzer & Eric Talley, Endowment Effects Within Corporate Agency Relationships, 31 J. Legal Stud. 1 (2002).
Amitai Aviram & Avishalom Tor, Overcoming Impediments to Information Sharing, 55 Ala. L. Rev. 231 (2004).
Kevin Avruch, Culture as Context, Culture as Communication: Considerations for Humanitarian Negotiators, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 391 (2004).
Robert Axelrod, The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoist, 75 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 306 (1981).
Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein, Samuel Issacharoff & Colin Camerer, Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining, 85 Am. Econ. Rev. 1337 (1995).
Linda Babcock & Greg Pogarsky, Damage Caps and Settlement: A Behavioral Approach, 28 J. Legal Stud. 341 (1999).
R. Lisle Baker, Using Insights About Perception and Judgment from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument as an Aid to Mediation, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 115 (2004).
Samuel R. Bagenstos & Margo Schlanger, Hedonic Damages, Hedonic Adaptation, and Disability, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 745 (2007).
Douglas G. Baird, Robert H. Gertner & Randal C. Picker, Game Theory and the Law (1994).
Derek E. Bambauer, Shopping Badly: Cognitive Biases, Communications, and the Falacy of the Marketplace of Ideas, 77 U. Colo. L. Rev. 649 (2006).
Joseph Bankman and Ronald J. Gilson, Why Start-Ups?, 51 Stan. L. Rev. 289 (1999).
Oren Bar-Gill, The Evolution and Persistence of Optimism in Litigation, 22 J.L. Econ. & Org. 490 (2006).
Eleanor Barr, Making Sound Decisions: How to Help Your Client Evaluate Settlement Options, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 65 (2006).
Max H. Bazerman & James J. Gillispie, Betting on the Future: The Virtues of Contingent Contracts, Harv. Bus. Rev., Sept.-Oct. 1999, at 155.
Max H. Bazerman & Dolly Chugh, Bounded Awareness: Focusing Failures in Negotiation, in Negotiation Theory and Research 7 (Leigh L. Thompson, ed., 2006).
Max H. Bazerman et al., Explaining How Preferences Change Across Joint Versus Separate Evaluation, 39 J. of Economic Behavior & Org. 41 (1999).
Max H. Bazerman & Margaret A. Neale, Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution, in Negotiating in Organizations 51 (Max H. Bazerman & Roy J. Lewicki eds., 1983).
Max H. Bazerman and Margaret A. Neale, Improving Negotiation Effectiveness Under Final Offer Arbitration: The Role of Selection and Training, 67 J. Applied Psychol. 543 (1982).
Max H. Bazerman et al., Integrative Bargaining in a Competitive Market, 35 Organizational Behav. & Hum. Decision Processes 294 (1984).
Max H. Bazerman, Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (6th ed. 2006).
Max H. Bazerman & Margaret A. Neale, Negotiating Rationally (1992).
Max H. Bazerman et al., Negotiation, 51 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 279 (2000).
Max H. Bazerman et al., Negotiating With Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions With Competing Internal Preferences, 23 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 225 (1998).
Max H. Bazerman & John S. Carroll, Negotiator Cognition, 9 Res. Organizational Behav. 247 (1987).
Max H. Bazerman, Negotiator Judgment, 27 Am. Behav. Scientist 211 (1983).
Max H. Bazerman & Margaret A. Neale, Negotiator Reality and Negotiator Cognition: The Interactive Roles of Prescriptive and Descriptive Research, in Negotiation Analysis 109 (H. Peyton Young ed., 1991).
Max H. Bazerman & George Loewenstein, Taking the Bias Out of Bean Counting, Harv. Bus. Rev., Nov. 2001, at 28.
Max H. Bazerman et al., The Death and Rebirth of the Social Psychology of Negotiation in Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes 196, 196-228 (Garth J. O. Fletcher & Margaret S. Clark eds., 2001).
Max H. Bazerman et al., The Effects of Agents and Mediators on Negotiation Outcomes, 53 Org. Behav. & Human Decision Processes 55 (1992).
Max H. Bazerman et al., The Impossibility of Auditor Independence, 38 Sloan Mgmt. Rev. 89 (1997).
Max H. Bazerman & Margaret A. Neale, The Role of Fairness Considerations and Relationships in a Judgmental Perspective of Negotiation, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution 86 (Kenneth J. Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Max H. Bazerman & Margaret A. Neale, The Role of Perspective-taking Ability in Negotiating Under Different Forms of Arbitration, 36 Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev. 378 (1983).
Max H. Bazerman et al., Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits, Harv. Bus. Rev., Nov. 2002, at 96.
Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Andrew T. Guzman, How Would You Like to Pay for That? The Strategic Effects of Fee Arrangements on Settlement Terms, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 53 (1996).
Lucian A. Bebchuk, Litigation and Settlement Under Imperfect Information, 15 Rand J. Econ. 404 (1984).
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, A New Theory Concerning the Credibility and Success of Threats to Sue, 25 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1996).
Lucian A. Bebchuk & Richard A. Posner, One-Sided Contracts in Competitive Consumer Markets, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 827 (2006).
Michael Benoliel & Linda Cashdan, The Upper Hand: Winning Strategies From World-Class Negotiators (2006).
Bruce L. Beron, Litigation Risk Management Analysis: A Comprehensive, Logical Approach to Litigation Decision-Making, 550 PLI/Lit 27 (1996).
Sanjai Bhagat, John Bizjak & Jeffrey L. Coles, The Shareholder Wealth Implications of Corporate Lawsuits, 27 Fin. Mgmt. 5 (1998).
John Bickerman, Evaluative Mediator Responds, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 70 (1996).
Richard Birke, Evaluation and Facilitation: Moving Past Either/Or, 2000 J. Disp. Resol. 309 (2000).
Richard Birke & Craig A. Fox, Psychological Principles in Negotiating Civil Settlements, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (1999).
Kristen Blankley, Note, Be More Specific! Can Writing a Detailed Arbitration Agreement Expand Judicial Review Under the Federal Arbitration Act?, 2 Seton Hall Cir. Rev. 391 (2006).
Kenneth H. Blanchard & Spencer Johnson, The One Minute Manager (1982).
Kenneth H. Blanchard & Robert Lorber, Putting The One Minute Manager to Work (1984).
William J. Blanton, Reducing the Value of Plaintiff’s Litigation Option in Federal Court: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2 Geo. Mason U. L. Rev. 159 (1995).
William S. Blatt, What’s Special About Mediation? Contemplative Practices for American Lawyers, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 125 (2002).
Susan Block-Lieb & Edward J. Janger, The Myth of the Rational Borrower: Rationality, Behavioralism, and the Misguided “Reform” of Bankruptcy Law, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 1481 (2006).
Jeremy A. Blumenthal, Law and the Emotions: The Problems of Affective Forecasting, 80 Ind. L.J. 155 (2005).
Eric Bonabeau, Don’t Trust Your Gut, Harv. Bus. Rev., May 2003, at 116 (2003).
Robert C. Bordone, Electronic Online Dispute Resolution: A Systems Approach – Potential, Problems, and a Proposal, 3 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 175 (1998).
George E.P. Box, Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building, in Robustness in Statistics 201 (Robert L. Launer & Graham N. Wilkinson eds., 1979).
Andrea M. Braeutigam, Fusses That Fit Online: Online Mediation in Non-Commercial Contexts, 5 Appalachian J. L. 275 (2006).
Jack W. Brehm, A Theory of Psychological Reactance (1966).
Lester Brickman & Lawrence A. Cunningham, Game Theory and Nonrefundable Retainers: A Response to Professors Croson and Mnookin, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 69 (1997).
John Bronsteen, Against Summary Judgment, 75 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 522 (2007).
John Bronsteen, Some Thoughts About the Economics of Settlement, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 1129 (2009-2010).
John Bronsteen, Christopher Buccafusco & Jonathan S. Masur, Hedonic Adaptation and the Settlement of Civil Lawsuits, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 1516 (2008).
Scott Brown, New Communications Law Encourages the Use of ADR, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 82 (1996).
Edward Brunet & Charles B. Craver, Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Advocate’s Perspective (2d ed. 2001).
Stephen McG. Bundy & Einer Richard Elhauge, Do Lawyers Improve the Adversary System? A General Theory of Litigation Advice and Its Regulation, 79 Cal. L. Rev. 313 (1991).
Stephen McG. Bundy, The Policy in Favor of Settlement in an Adversary System, 44 Hastings L.J. 1 (1992).
Robert A. Baruch Bush & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition (1995).
Robert A. Baruch Bush & Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (2005).
Paul Butler, The Case for Trials: Considering the Intangibles, 1 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 627 (2004).
Emily M. Calhoun, Workplace Mediation: The First-Phase, Private Caucus in Individual Discrimination Disputes, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 187 (2004).
Robert B. Calihan et al., The Role of Risk Analysis in Dispute and Litigation Management (2004). Available at www.litigationrisk.com/Paper%20on%20Risk%20Analysis%20for%20ABA%20Forum%20on%20Franchising.pdf (last accessed Apr. 4, 2007).
Richard M. Calkins, Caucus Mediation – Putting Conciliation Back Into the Process: The Peacemaking Approach to Resolution, Peace, and Healing, 54 Drake L. Rev. 259 (2006).
Craig R. Callan, Informational Indigestion and Rationality, 41 Jurimetrics 513 (2001).
Colin F. Camerer, Progress in Behavioral Game Theory, 11 J. Econ. Persp. 167 (1997).
Natasha I. Campbell, Encouraging More Effective Use of Court-Appointed Experts and Technical Advisors, 67 Def. Couns. J. 196 (2000).
Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass (1923).
John S. Carroll & John W. Payne, An Information Processing Approach to Two-Party Negotiations, 3 Res. Negotiation Org. 3 (1991).
Kevin R. Casey, Law Firm ADR Departments Can Respond to Market Challenges, 25 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 1 (2007).
Rajib Chanda, Mediating University Sexual Assault Cases, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 265 (2001).
Stephen Charest, Bayesian Approaches to the Precautionary Principle, 12 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 265 (2002).
Dolly Chugh & Max H. Bazerman, Bounded Awareness: What You Fail to See Can Hurt You, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 05-037, 2005), online at www.people.hbs.edu/mbazerman/Papers/05-037.pdf (last accessed Feb. 9, 2007).
Eugene Clark et al, Online Dispute Resolution: Present Realities, Pressing Problems and Future Prospects, 17 Int’l Rev. L. Computers & Tech. 7 (2003).
Ronald H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1960).
Sara Cobb, A Developmental Approach to Turning Points: “Irony” as an Ethics for Negotiation Pragmatics, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 147 (2006).
Robert F. Cochran, Jr. et al., Symposium: Client Counseling and Moral Responsibility, 30 Pepp. L. Rev. 591 (2003).
James R. Coben & Peter N. Thompson, Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation About Mediation, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 43 (2006).
Douglas A. Codiga, Reflections on the Potential Growth of Mindfulness Mediation in the Law, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 109 (2002).
Amy J. Cohen, Debating the Globalization of U.S. Mediation: Politics, Power, and Practice in Nepal, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 295 (2006).
I. Glenn Cohen, Negotiating Death: ADR and End of Life Decision-making, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 253 (2004).
James R. Cohen & Peter N. Thompson, Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation About Mediation, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 43 (2006).
Jonathan R. Cohen, Legislating Apology: The Pros and Cons, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 819 (2002).
Jonathan R. Cohen, Reasoning Along Different Lines: Some Varied Roles of Rationality in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, 3 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 111 (1998).
Jonathan R. Cohen, When People are the Means: Negotiating with Respect, 14 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 739 (2001).
Peter J. Comodeca, Ready . . . Set . . . Mediate, 56 Disp. Resol. J. 32 (2001).
Laurence D. Connor, How to Combine Facilitation with Evaluation, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 15 (1996).
Robert Cooter, Stephen Marks & Robert Mnookin, Bargaining In the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior, J. Legal Stud. 225 (1982).
Robert D. Cooter & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution, 27 J. Econ. Literature 1067 (1989).
Robert Cooter, Liability Rights As Contingent Claims, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics and the Law (Peter Newman ed. 1998).
Robert Cooter, The Cost of Coase, 11 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1982).
Margaret Meriwether Cordray, Settlement Agreements and the Supreme Court, 48 Hastings L.J. 9 (1996).
Bradford Cornell, The Incentive to Sue: An Option-Pricing Approach, 19 J. Legal Stud. 173 (1990).
Barbara Cosens, Note, Truth or Consequences: Settling Water Disputes in the Face of Uncertainty, 42 Idaho L.J. 717 (2006).
Don L. Coursey & Linda R. Stanley, Pretrial Bargaining Behavior within the Shadow of the Law: Theory and Experimental Evidence, 8 Int’l. Rev. Law & Econ. 161 (1988).
William F. Coyne, Jr., The Case for Settlement Counsel, 14 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 367 (1999).
CPR Meeting, Business Mediation, from All Points of View: A Neutral, an Advocate, and an In-House Client on Preparing for ADR, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 101 (2006).
Charles B. Craver, Effective Legal Negotiation and Settlement (4th ed. 2001).
Charles B. Craver, The Intelligent Negotiator: What to Say, What to Do, How to Get What You Want, Every Time (2002).
Charles B. Craver, The Negotiation Process, 27 Am. J. Trial Advocacy 271 (2003).
Catherine Cronin-Harris & Peter H. Kaskell, How ADR Finds a Home in Corporate Law Departments, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 158 (1997).
David C. Croson & Robert H. Mnookin, Scaling the Stonewall: Retaining Lawyers to Bolster Credibility, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 65 (1996).
Cris M. Currie, Mediating off the Grid, 59-JUL Disp. Resol. J. 9 (2004).
Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Thomas Kochan, John-Paul Ferguson, & Betty Barrett, Collective Bargaining in the Twenty-First Century: A Negotiations Institution at Risk, 23 Neg. J. 249 (2007).
David M. Cutler & Lawrence H. Summers, The Costs of Conflict Resolution and Financial Distress: Evidence From the Texaco-Pennzoil Litigation, 19 RAND J. Econ. 157 (1988).
Grace E. D’Alo, Accountability in Special Education Mediation: Many a Slip ‘Twixt Vision and Practice, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 201 (2003).
Scott S. Dahl, Ethics on the Table: Stretching the Truth in Negotiations, 8 Rev. Litig. 173 (1989).
Susan Daicoff, Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalism, 46 Am. U. L. Rev. 1337 (1997) (comprehensive treatment of the lawyer personality).
Matthew Daiker, No J.D. Required: The Critical Role and Contributions of Non-Lawyer Mediators, 24 Rev. Litig. 499 (2005).
Megan P. Davis, From Procedural Law to Preemption: The Supreme Court’s Transformation of the Federal Arbitration Act, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 169 (1996).
Melody Richardson Daily, Chris Gutherie & Leonard L. Riskin, Damages: Using a Case Study to Teach Law, Lawyering, and Dispute Resolution, 2004 J. Disp. Resol. 1 (2004).
Christopher DeMayo, The Mediation Privilege and Its Limits, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 383 (2000).
Dennis J. Devine et al., Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups, 7 Psychol. Pub. Pol’y & L. 622 (2001).
Rene Diaz, Ten Keys to Successful Mediation, Available at www.diazmediation.com/Info/V2%20Ten%20Keys%20to%20Successful%20Mediation.pdf (last accessed May 1, 2007).
John J. Donohue III, Commentary, Opting for the British Rule, Or If Posner and Shavell Can’t Remember the Coase Theorum, Who Will?, 104 Harv. L. Rev. 1093 (1991).
John J. Donohue III, The Effects of Fee Shifting on the Settlement Rate: Theoretical Observations on Costs, Conflicts, and Contingency Fees, 54 Law & Contemp. Probs. 195 (1991).
William A. Donohue & Paul J. Taylor, Role Effects in Negotiation: The One-Down Phenomenon, 23 Neg. J. 307 (2007).
Laurie Kratky Doré, Public Courts Versus Private Justice: It’s Time To Let Some Sun Shine in on Alternative Dispute Resolution, 81 Chi-Kent L. Rev. 463 (2006).
Brian Dorini, Institutionalizing ADR: Wagshal v. Foster and Mediator Immunity, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 185 (1996).
Christopher R. Drahozal & Keith N. Hylton, The Economics of Litigation and Arbitration: An Application to Franchise Contracts, 32 J. Legal Stud. 549 (2003).
Dennis J. Drasco, Public Access to Information in Civil Litigation vs. Litigant’s Demand for Privacy: Is the “Vanishing Trial” An Avoidable Consequence?, 2006 J. Disp. Resol. 155 (2006).
Hillel J. Einhorn & Robin M. Hogarth, Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice, 32 Ann. Rev. Psychol. 53 (1981).
Hillel J. Einhorn & Robin M. Hogarth, Confidence in Judgment: Persistence of the Illusion of Validity, 85 Psychol. Rev. 395 (1978).
Joel B. Eisen, Are We Ready for Mediation in Cyberspace?, 1998 BYU L. Rev. 1305 (1998).
Melvin Aron Eisenberg, The Limits of Cognition and the Limits of Contract, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 211 (1995).
Kathleen Engelmann and Bradford Cornell, Measuring the Cost of Corporate Litigation: Five Case Studies, 17 J. Legal Stud. 377 (1988).
Nancy D. Erbe, Appreciating Mediation’s Global Role in Promoting Good Governance, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 355 (2006).
Richard Ettenson et al., Expert Judgment: Is More Information Better?, 60 Psychol. Rep. 227, 237 (1987) (arguing, based on a study of auditors, that the “ability to concentrate on what is relevant without necessarily using all available information many differentiate expert decision makers from their less-experienced counterparts” and that “the nonuse of information by experts reflects ‘skilled omission’ rather than a cognitive limitation.”).
David Fairman, Patrick Field, and Hal Movius, The Negotiator’s Fieldbook: The Virtues and Limits of a Kaleidoscope, 23 Neg. J. 343 (2007).
Amy Farmer & Paul Pecorino, Bargaining With Voluntary Transmission of Private Information: Does The Use of Final Offer Arbitration Impede Settlement?, 19 J.L. Econ. & Org. 64 (2003).
Ward Farnsworth, The Taste for Fairness, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 1992 (2002).
Kenneth R. Feinberg, Reexamining the Arguments in Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 1171 (2009-2010).
Michael Fischer, Stuck in the Middle Again, 116 ADE Bulletin 38 (1997).
Baruch Fischoff, Debiasing, in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 422 (Kahneman et al. eds., 1982).
Baruch Fischoff et al., Knowing With Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence, 3 J. Experimental Psychol.: Hum. Perceptions & Performance 552 (1977).
Baruch Fischoff, Latitudes and Platitudes: How Much Credit Do People Deserve?, in Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry (Gerardo Ungson & Daniel Braunstein eds., 1982).
Roger Fisher, Elizabeth Koppelman & Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Beyond Machiavelli: Tools for Coping With Conflict 142 (1994).
Roger Fisher & Daniel Shapiro, Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate (2005).
Roger Fisher & Danny Ertel, Getting Ready to Negotiate: The Getting to Yes Workbook (1995).
Roger Fisher, He Who Pays The Piper, Harv. Bus. Rev., Mar.-Apr. 1985, at 150.
Roger Fisher, William Ury & Bruce Patton, Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (2d ed. 1991).
Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 Yale L.J. 1073 (1984).
Sean M. Flanagan, The Rise of a Trade Association: Group Interactions Within the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 211 (2001).
Erica L. Fox, Alone in the Hallway: Challenges to Effective Self-Representation in Negotiation, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 85 (1996).
Clark Freshman, Adele M. Hayes & Greg C. Feldman, Adapting Mediation to Promote Negotiation Success: A Guide to Varieties and Scientific Support, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 67 (2002).
James C. Freund, Anatomy of a Split-Up: Mediating the Business Divorce, 52 Bus. Law. 479 (1996).
James C. Freund, The Business Lawyer as Mediator, 16 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. (1988).
Alan E. Friedman, Note, An Analysis of Settlement, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 67 (1969).
Ezra Friedman & Abraham L. Wickelgren, No Free Lunch: How Settlement Can Reduce the Legal System’s Ability to Induce Efficient Behavior, 61 SMU L. Rev. 1355 (2008).
Marc Galanter, An Oil Strike in Hell: Contemporary Legends About the Civil Justice System, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 717 (1998).
Marc Galanter & Mia Cahill, “Most Cases Settle”: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements, 46 Stan. L. Rev. 1339 (1994).
Marc Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trial and Related Matters in State and Federal Courts, 1 J. Empirical Leg. Stud. 459 (2004).
Adam D. Galinski & Gordon B. Moskowitz, Counterfactuals as Behavioral Primes: Priming the Simulation Heuristic and Consideration of Alternatives, 36 J. Experimental Soc. Psychol. 384 (2000).
Adam D. Galinsky & Thomas Mussweiler, First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective-Taking and Negotiator Focus, 81 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 657 (2001).
Llewellyn Joseph Gibbins, Robin M. Kennedy & Jon Michael Gibbs, Cyber-Mediation: Computer-Mediated Communications Medium Massaging the Message, 32 N.M. L. Rev. 27 (2002).
Kevin Gibson, Leigh Thompson & Max H. Bazerman, Biases and Rationality in the Mediation Process, in Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues 163 (Linda Heath et al. eds., 1994).
Kevin Gibson, Leigh Thompson & Max H. Bazerman, Shortcomings of Neutrality in Mediation: Solutions Based on Rationality, 12 Neg. J. 69 (1996).
Daniel T. Gilbert et al., Immune Neglect: A Source of Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting, 75 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 617 (1998).
Daniel T. Gilbert, Inferential Correction, in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 167 (Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin & Daniel Kahneman eds., 2002).
Ronald J. Gilson & Robert H. Mnookin, Cooperation and Competition in Litigation: Can Lawyers Dampen Conflict?, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution 184 (Kenneth Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Ronald J. Gilson & Robert H. Mnookin, Disputing Through Agents: Cooperation and Conflict Between Lawyers in Litigation, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 509 (1994) (arguing that litigators can use their reputations for cooperation to build trust and facilitate effective negotiated agreements).
Ronald J. Gilson & Robert H. Mnookin, Forward: Business Lawyers and Value Creation for Clients, 74 Or. L. Rev. 1 (1995).
Ronald J. Gilson, Value Creation by Business Lawyers: Legal Skills and Asset Pricing, 94 Yale L.J. 239 (1984) (describing how business lawyers can function as “transaction cost engineers” to facilitate better deals for their clients).
Malcolm Gladwell, Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005).
Malcolm Gladwell, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (2000).
Andrew C. Glass & Albert S. Lee, The Validity of Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 193 (1996).
Dwight Golann, Benefits and Dangers of Mediation Evaluation, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 35 (1997).
Dwight Golann, Is Legal Mediation a Process of Repair – or Separation? An Empirical Study, and Its Implications, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 301 (2002).
Dwight Golann, Planning for Mediation Evaluation, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 49 (1997).
Dwight Golann & Marjorie Corman Aaron, Using Evaluations in Mediation, 52 Disp. Resol. J. 26 (1997).
Stephen B. Goldberg & Frank E.A. Sander, Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: Factors to Consider When Selecting an ADR Procedure, 12 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 48 (1994).
Stephen B. Goldberg, Mediators Reveal Their Essential Techniques for Successful Settlements, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 81 (2006).
Stephen B. Goldberg, A Review of Beyond Winning, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 319 (2001).
Stephen B. Goldberg, Research Backs Survey Results: Achieving Rapport Is the Key to Getting Mediation Parties to Reach a Settlement, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 99 (2006).
Stephen B. Goldberg, The Secrets of Successful Mediators, 21 Neg. J. 365 (2005).
Lee Goldman, Contractually Expanded Review of Arbitration Awards, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 171 (2003).
Dan L. Goldwasser, Introduction to Claims Analysis and Evaluation, in 550 Prac. L. Inst./Litig. 7 (1996).
John P. Gould, The Economics of Legal Conflicts, 2 J. Legal Stud. 279 (1973).
Anthony J. Greco, Professional Fees Associated with Collaborative Divorce Resolution: The Evidence to Date, 13 J. Legal Econ., Sept., 75 (2006).
David M. Grether et al., The Irrelevance of Information Overload: An Analysis of Search and Disclosure, 59 S. Cal. L. Rev. 277 (1986).
Jill I. Gross, Securities Mediation: Dispute Resolution for the Individual Investor, 21 Ohio. St. J. on Disp. Resol. 329 (2006).
Samuel R. Gross & Kent D. Syverud, Don’t Try: Civil Verdicts in a System Geared to Settlement, 44 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (1996).
Samuel R. Gross & Kent D. Syverud, Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial, 90 Mich. L. Rev. 319 (1991).
Peter Z. Grossman, The Market for Shares of Companies With Unlimited Liability: The Case of American Express, 24 J. Legal Stud. 63 (1995).
Joseph A. Grundfest & Peter H. Huang, The Unexpected Value of Litigation: A Real Options Perspective, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1267 (2006).
Werner Guth & Reinhard Tietz, Ultimatum Bargaining Behavior: A Survey and Comparison of Experimental Results, 11 J. Econ. Psychol. 417, 447 (1990).
Chris Guthrie, Beyond Reason and Behind Emotion, 12 NO. 4 Disp. Resol. Mag. 7 (2006).
Chris Guthrie, Framing Frivolous Litigation: A Psychological Theory, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 163 (2000).
Chris Guthrie, The Lawyer’s Philosophical Map and the Disputant’s Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 145 (2001).
Chris Guthrie, Panacea or Pandora’s Box?: The Costs of Options in Negotiation, 88 Iowa L. Rev. 601 (2003).
Chris Guthrie, Principles of Influence in Negotiation, 87 Marq. L. Rev. 829 (2004).
Chris Guthrie, Review Essay: Using Bargaining for Advantage in Law School Negotiation Courses, 16 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 219 (2000).
Gillian K. Hadfield, Where Have All the Trials Gone? Settlements, Nontrial Adjudications, and Statistical Artifacts in the Changing Disposition of Federal Civil Cases, 1 J. Empir. L. Stud. 705 (2004).
Lan Q. Hang, Online Dispute Resolution Systems: The Future of Cyberspace Law, 41 Santa Clara L. Rev. 837 (2001).
Jon D. Hanson & Douglas A. Kysar, Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 630 (1999).
Bruce W. Hardy & Dietram A. Scheufele, Examining Differential Gains From Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions, 55 J. Comm. (2005).
Harvard Business Essentials, Negotiation (2003).
Taketoshi Hatta, Ken-ichi Ohbuchi & Mitsuteru Fukuno, An Experimental Study on the Effects of Exitability and Correctability on Electronic Negotiation, 23 Neg. J. 283 (2007).
Bruce L. Hay, Effort, Information, Settlement, Trial, 24 J. Legal Stud. 29 (1995).
Nathan L. Hecht, Jury Trials Trending Down In Texas Civil Cases, 69 Tex. B.J. 854 (Oct. 2006).
Nathan L. Hecht, The Vanishing Civil Trial: Trends in Texas Courts and an Uncertain Future, 47 S. Tex. L. Rev. 163 (2005).
Brian L. Heisterkamp, Taking the Footing of a Neutral Mediator, 23 Conflict Resol. Q. 301 (2006).
Patrick Henry, Speech to Second Virginia Convention (Mar. 23, 1775), in Norine Dickson Campbell, Patrick Henry: Patriot and Statesman 130 (1969).
Joni Hersch, Demand for a Jury Trial and the Selection of Cases for Trial, 35 J. Legal Stud. 119 (2006).
H. Lee Hetherington, The Wizard and Dorothy, Patton and Rommel: Negotiation Parables in Fiction and Fact, 28 Pepp. L. Rev. 289 (2000).
Edward R. Hirt & Keith D. Markman, Multiple Explanation: A Consider-an-Alternative Strategy for Debiasing Judgments, 69 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 1069 (1995).
Karin S. Hobbs, Attention Attorneys!: How to Achieve the Best Results in Mediation, 54 Disp. Resol. J. 43 (1999).
David P. Hoffer, Computer-Based Risk Analysis: A Tool for Mediators. Available at www.ombuds.org/center/aaron/center/hoffer.html (last accessed Apr. 4, 2007).
David P. Hoffer, Decision Analysis as a Mediator’s Tool, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 113 (1996).
David A. Hoffman, Tools of the Trade: A Manual for the Settlement-Oriented Mediation, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 229 (1997).
Lonny Sheinkoph Hoffman, Access to Information, Access to Justice: The Role of Presuit Investigatory Discovery, 40 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 217 (2007).
Robin M. Hogarth & Melvin W. Reder, Editor’s Comments: Perspectives From Economics and Psychology, 59 J. Bus. S185 (1986).
Keith J. Holyoak & Robert G. Morrison, Thinking and Reasoning: A Reader’s Guide, in The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning 1 (Keith J. Holyoak & Robert G. Morrison eds., 2005).
Christopher Honeyman, Theory v. Practice in Dispute Resolution, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 93 (1997).
Julia Hornle, Online Dispute Resolution: The Emperor’s New Cloths?, 17 Int’l Rev. L. Computers & Tech. 27 (2003).
Peter H. Huang, Lawsuit Abandonment Options in Possibly Frivolous Litigation Games, 23 Rev. Litig. 47 (2004).
Stephen Huber, Fifth Circuit Survey, June 2004—May 2005: Survey Article: The Arbitration Jurisprudence of the Fifth Circuit: Round III, 38 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 535 (2006).
James W. Hughes & Edward A. Snyder, Litigation and Settlement Under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence, 37 J.L. & Econ. 225 (1995).
Keith N. Hylton, An Economic Theory of the Duty to Bargain, 83 Geo. L.J. 19 (1994).
Keith N. Hylton, Welfare Implications of Costly Litigation Under Strict Liability, 4 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 18 (2002).
Jonathan M. Hyman, Swimming in the Deep End: Dealing With Justice in Mediation, 6 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 19 (2004).
Samuel Issacharoff & Catherine M. Sharkey, Backdoor Federalization, 53 UCLA L. Rev.1353 (2006).
Samuel Issacharoff & George Loewenstein, Second Thoughts About Summary Judgment, 100 Yale L.J. 73 (1990).
Samuel Issacharoff, The Content of Our Casebooks: Why Do Cases Get Litigated, 29 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1265 (2002).
Joseph Jaworski, Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership (1996).
Di Jiang-Schuerger, Perfect Arbitration = Arbitration + Litigation?, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 231 (1999).
Jason Scott Johnston & Joel Waldfogel, Does Repeat Play Elicit Cooperation? Evidence from Federal Civil Litigation, 31 J. Legal Stud. 39 (2002).
Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein & Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law & Economics, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1471 (1998).
Christine Jolls & Cass R. Sunstein, Debiasing Through Law, 35 J. Legal Stud. 199 (2006).
Gregory Todd Jones & Douglas H. Yarn, Evaluative Dispute Resolution Under Uncertainty: An Emperical Look at Bayes’ Theorem and the Expected Value of Perfect Information, 2003 J. Disp. Res. 427 (2003).
Gregory Todd Jones, Fighting Capitulation: A Research Agenda for the Future of Dispute Resolution, 108 Penn St. L. Rev. 277 (2003).
Jeremy Joseph, Mediation in War: Winning Hearts and Minds Using Mediated Condolence Payments, 23 Neg. J. 219 (2007).
Daniel Kahneman & Shane Frederick, A Model of Heuristic Judgment, in The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning 267 (Keith J. Holyoak & Robert G. Morrison eds., 2005).
Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, Choices, Values, and Frames, 39 Am. Psychologist 341 (1984).
Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, Conflict Resolution: A Cognitive Perspective, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution (Kenneth Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Status Quo Bias, J. Econ. Perspectives, Winter 1991, at 193.
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky eds., 1982).
Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, 47 Econometrica 263 (1979).
Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Status Quo Bias, J. Econ. Perspectives, Winter 1991, at 193.
Michael W. Kalcheim, Apportioning Stock Options at Divorce: A Detailed Guide, 91 Ill. B.J. 454 (2003).
Ethan Katsh & Janet Rifkin, Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cybeberspace (2001).
Ethan Katsh, Online Dispute Resolution: The Next Phase, 7(2) Lex Electronica (2002). Available at www.lex-electronica.org/articles/v7-2/katsh.htm (last accessed Apr. 4, 2007).
Steven W. Keeva, Practicing from the Inside Out, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 97 (2002).
Garrison Keillor, Lake Wobegon Days (1985).
James Todd Kennard, Lawyers, Sex, and Marriage: Factors Empirically Correlated with the Decision to Settle, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 149 (1997).
Andrew Kepper, Note, Contractual Waiver of Seventh Amendment Rights: Using the Public Rights Doctrine to Justify a Higher Standard of Waiver for Jury-Waiver Clauses than for Arbitration Clauses, 19 Iowa L. Rev. 1345 (2006).
Jeff Kichaven, For Professional Mediators, It’s About More Than Assessing the Case’s Value, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 129 (2006).
Jeff Kichaven, How a Judge’s Overzealousness Will Help Redefine Mediation Limits, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 17 (2006).
Jeff Kichaven, Pay More and Resolve Cases? The Value Issue in Court Mediation, 23 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 177 (2005).
D. Marc Kilgour, Liping Fang, and Keith W. Hipel, GMCR in Negotiations, 11 Neg. J. 151 (1995).
Robert L. King, Screening Device Determines ADR Suitability, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 7 (1997).
Mark Klock, Financial Options, Real Options, and Legal Options: Opting to Exploit Ourselves and What We Can Do About It, 55 Ala. L. Rev. 63 (2003).
Russell Korobkin, Aspirations and Settlement, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Russell Korobkin, Bargaining Power As Threat of Impasse, 87 Marq. L. Rev. 867 (2004).
Russell Korobkin, How Neutrals Can Overcome the Psychology of Disputing: The Effect of Framing and Reactive Devaluation in Mediation, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 83 (2006).
Russell Korobkin, Negotiation Theory and Strategy (2002).
Russell Korobkin & Chris Gutherie, Opening Offers and Out-of-Court Settlement: A Little Moderation May Not Go a Long Way, 10 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 1 (1994).
Russell Korobkin & Chris Guthrie, Psychological Barriers to Litigation Settlement: An Experimental Approach, 93 Mich. L. Rev. 107 (1994).
Russell Korobkin & Chris Guthrie, Psychology, Economics, and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 77 (1997).
Russell Korobkin, Psychological Biases that Become Mediation Impediments Can Be Overcome with Interventions that Minimize Blockages, 24 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 67 (2006).
Russell Korobkin, Psychological Impediments to Mediation Success: Theory and Practice, 21 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 281 (2006).
Kimberlee Kovach & Lela P. Love, “Evaluative” Mediation is an Oxymoron, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 31 (1996).
Kimberlee Kovach & Lela P. Love, Mapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin’s Grid, 3 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 71 (1998).
Kimberlee K. Kovach, Musings on Idea(l)s In the Ethical Regulation of Mediators: Honesty, Enforcement, and Education, 21 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 123 (2005).
Peter J. Kreher & Pat D. Robertson III, Substance, Process, and the Future of Class Arbitration, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 409 (2004).
Jeffery Krivis & Barbara McAdoo, A Style Index for Mediators, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 157 (1997).
Jeffrey Krivis, Calling a Truce in the Office: Ten Tips for Negotiating Workplace Conflicts, 8 NO. 21 Lawyers J. 5 (2006).
Jeffery Krivis, How Structure Helps Mediation, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 110 (1997).
Jeffrey Krivis, Improvisational Negotiation: A Mediator’s Stories of Conflict About Love, Money, Anger – And The Strategies That Resolved Them (2006).
Jeffery Krivis, Mediating in Cyberspace, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. (1996).
Joachim Krueger, Distributive Judgments Under Uncertainty: Paccioli’s Game Revisited, 129 J. Exp. Psych: Gen 546 (2000).
Gillian Ku & Deepak Malhotra, The On-line Auction Phenomenon: Growth, Strategies, Promise, and Problems, 17 Neg. J. 349 (2001).
Donald C. Langevoort, Ego, Human Behavior, and Law, 81 Va. L. Rev. 853 (1995).
John Lande, Getting the Faith: Why Business Lawyers and Executives Believe in Mediation, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 137 (2000).
John Lande, Failing Faith in Litigation? A Survey of Business Lawyers’ and Executives’ Opinions, 3 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (1998).
John Lande, Relationships Drive Support for Mediation, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 95 (1997).
William M. Landes, An Economic Analysis of the Courts, 14 J.L. & Econ. 61 (1971).
Dana Lansky, Proceeding to a Constitution: A Multi-Party Negotiation Analysis of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 279 (2000).
David A. Larson, Online Dispute Resolution: Do You Know Where Your Children Are?, 19 Neg. J. 199 (2003).
David Allen Larson, Technology Mediated Dispute Resolution (TMDR): A New Paradigm for ADR, 21 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 629 (2006).
David A. Lax & James K. Sebenius, Dealcrafting: The Substance of Three-Dimentional Negotiations, 18 Neg. J. 5 (2002).
Aaron Lazare, On Apology (2004).
Robyn A. LeBoeuf & Eldar B. Shafir, Decision Making, in The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning 243 (Keith J. Holyoak & Robert G. Morrison eds., 2005).
Leandra Lederman, Precedent Lost: Why Encourage Settlement, And Why Permit Non-Party Involvement in Settlements?, 75 Notre Dame L. Rev. 221 (1999).
Jamie Alison Lee & Carl Geisler, Confidentiality in Mediation, 3 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 285 (1998).
Michael H. LeRoy & Peter Feuille, Reinventing the Enterprise Wheel: Court Review of Punitive Awards in Labor and Employment Arbitrations, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 199 (2006).
Roy J. Lewicki, Teaching Negotiation and Dispute Resolution in Colleges of Business: The State of the Practice, 13 Neg. J. 253 (1997).
Roy J. Lewicki et al., Think Before You Speak: The Complete Guide to Strategic Negotiation (1996).
Michael Lewis, Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game (2004).
Colleen A. Libbey, Working Together While “Waltzing in a Mine Field”: Successful Government Construction Contract Dispute Resolution With Partnering and Dispute Resolution Boards, 15 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 825 (2000).
E. Casey Lide, ADR and Cyberspace: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Online Commerce, Intellectual Property and Defamation, 12 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 192 (1996).
Andrew D. Lipman & Lawrence R. Freedman, Telecommunications Act’s ADR Approach, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 123 (1996).
David B. Lipsky & Ariel C. Avgar, Online Dispute Resolution Through the Lens of Bargaining and Negotiation Theory: Toward an Integrated Model, 38 U. Tol. L. Rev. 47 (2006).
David B. Lipsky & Ronald L. Seeber, Patterns of ADR Use in Corporate Disputes, 54-FEB Disp. Resol. J. 66 (1999).
Arno R. Lodder & John Zeleznikow, Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 287 (2005).
Arno R. Lodder & Ernest M. Thiessen, The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution, 2003 Proc. UNECE F. on ODR (Ethan Katsh & Daewon Choi eds.). Available at www.odr.info/unece2003/pdf/lodder_thiessen.pdf. (last accessed Apr. 4, 2007).
Elizabeth Loder, Moral Truthseeking and the Virtuous Negotiator, 8 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 45 (1994).
George Loewenstein, et al., Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining, 22 J. Legal Stud. 135 (1993).
George Loewenstein & Don A. Moore, When Ignorance Is Bliss: Information Exchange and Inefficiency in Bargaining, 33 J. Legal Stud. 37 (2004).
Dan Lovallo & Daniel Kahneman, Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives’ Decisions, Harv. Bus. Rev., July 2003, at 56.
Lela P. Love & Kimberlee K. Kovach, ADR: An Eclectic Array of Processes, Rather Than One Eclectic Process, 2000 J. Disp. Resol. 295 (2000).
Lela Love, The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate, 24 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 937 (1997).
L. Randolph Lowry, To Evaluate or Not: That is Not the Question!, 38 Fam. & Conciliation Cts. Rev. 48 (2000).
L. Randolph Lowry, Negotiation and Settlement Advocacy Notebook, Pepp. U. Inst. for Disp. Resol. 2:1-2:10 (1995).
Ian Macduff, Flames on the Wires: Mediating from an Electronic Cottage, ___ Neg. J. 5 (1994).
Jonathan R. Macey, Packaging Preferences and the Institutional Transformation of Interests, 61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1443 (1994).
Paul G. Mahoney, Contract Remedies and Option Pricing, 24 J. Legal Stud. 139 (1995).
Deepak Malhotra & Max H. Bazerman, Investigative Negotiation, Harv. Bus. Rev., Sept. 2007, at 73.
Ifat Maoz et al., Reactive Devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” Peace Proposal, 46 J. Conflict Resol. 515 (2002).
David E. Matz, Ignorance and Interests, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 59 (1999).
Barbara McAdoo & Nancy Welsh, Does ADR Really Have a Place on the Lawyer’s Philosophical Map?, 18 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 376 (1997).
E. Patrick McDermott & Ruth Obar, “What’s Going On” in Mediation: An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of a Mediator’s Style on Party Satisfaction and Monetary Benefit, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 75 (2004).
William Meadow & Cass R. Sunstein, Statistics, Not Experts, 51 Duke L.J. 629 (2001) (arguing that the legal system should rely more on statistical evidence than individual judgments).
Gary Mendelsohn, Lawyers as Negotiators, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 139 (1996).
Douglas L. Medin & Max H. Bazerman, Broadening Behavioral Decision Research: Multiple Levels of Cognitive Processing, 6 Psychonomic Bull. & Rev. 533, 536 (1999) (suggesting that “much of experimental economics consists of contrived experiments created in order to show convergence” of actual decision making and optimal decision making).
Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Aha? Is Creativity Possible in Legal Problem Solving and Teachable in Legal Education?, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 97 (2001).
Carrie Menkel-Meadow, From Legal Disputes to Conflict Resolution and Human Problem Solving – Legal Dispute Resolution in a Multidisciplinary Context, 54 J. Legal Educ. 7 (2004).
Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Is Mediation The Practice of Law, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 57 (1996).
David M. Messick & Max. H. Bazerman, Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making, 37 Sloan Mgmt. Rev. 9 (1996).
Michael B. Metzger, Bridging the Gaps: Cognitive Constraints on Corporate Control & Ethics Education, 16 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 435 (2005).
Bruce Meyerson, Lawyers Who Mediate Are Not Practicing Law, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 74 (1996).
Ben Mezrich, Bringing Down The House: The Inside Story of Six MIT Students Who Took Vegas for Millions (2003).
Arthur R. Miller, The Pretrial Rush to Judgment: Are the “Litigation Explosion,” “Liability Crisis,” and Efficiency Clichés Eroding Our Day in Court and Jury Trial Commitments?, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 982 (2003).
Geoffrey P. Miller, Some Agency Problems in Settlement, 16 J. Legal Stud. 189 (1987).
George A. Miller, The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits On Our Capacity for Processing Information, 63 Psychological Rev. 81 (1956).
James D. Miller, Using Lotteries to Expand the Range of Litigation Settlements, 26 J. Legal Stud. 69 (1997) (describing ways in which bets might facilitate settlement).
Gregory Mitchell, Why Law and Economics’ Perfect Rationality Should Not Be Traded for Behavioral Law and Economics’ Equal Incompetence, 91 Geo. L.J. 67 (2002).
Rosanne T. Mitchell, Resolving Domain Name-Trademark Disputes: A New System of Alternative Dispute Resolution is Needed in Cyberspace, 14 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 157 (1998).
Robert H. Mnookin & Lewis Kornhauser, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, 88 Yale L. J. 950 (1979).
Robert H. Mnookin, Scott R. Peppet & Andrew S. Tultmello, Beyond Winning: Negotiation to Create Value in Deals and Disputes (2000).
Robert N. Mnookin & Lee Ross, Introduction to Barriers to Conflict Resolution 17-18 (Kenneth J. Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Robert H. Mnookin & Robert B. Wilson, Rational Bargaining and Market Efficiency: Understanding Pennzoil v. Texaco, 75 Va. L. Rev. 295 (1989).
Robert H. Mnookin, Strategic Barriers to Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of Bilateral and Multilateral Negotiations, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2003).
Robert H. Mnookin, Why Negotiations Fail: An Exploration of Barriers to Resolution of Conflict, 8 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 235 (1993).
Robert B. Moberly, Mediator Gag Rules: Is It Ethical for Mediators to Evaluate or Advise?, 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 669 (1997).
Michael Moffitt, Pleadings in the Age of Settlement, 80 Ind. L.J. 727 (2005).
Michael L. Moffitt, Schmediation and the Dimensions of Definition, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 69 (2005).
Michael Moffitt, Ten Ways to Get Sued: A Guide for Mediators, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 81 (2003).
Scott A. Moss, Illuminating Secrecy: A New Economic Analysis of Confidential Settlements, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 867 (2007).
Janice Nadler, Electronically-Mediated Dispute Resolution and E-Commerce, 17 Neg. J. 333 (2001).
Janice Nadler, Rapport in Legal Negotiation: How Small Talk Can Facilitate E-mail Dealmaking, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 223 (2004).
Dan A. Naranjo, Mediating in a Highly Diverse and Volatile Society. Available at www.attorney-mediators.org/diverse.html (last accessed May 1, 2007).
Margaret A. Neale & Gregory B. Northcraft, Behavioral Negotiation Theory: A Framework for Conceptualizing Dyadic Bargaining, 13 Res. Organizational Behav. 147 (1991).
Margaret A. Neale & Max H. Bazerman, Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation (1991).
Margaret A. Neale & Max H. Bazerman, The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes, 28 Acad. Mgmt. J. 34 (1985).
Margaret A. Neale, Vandra L. Huber & Gregory B. Northcraft, The Framing of Negotiations, Contextual Versus Task Frames, 39 Organizational Behav. & Hum. Decision Processes 228 (1987).
Margaret A. Neale & Max H. Bazerman, The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating Under Different Forms of Arbitration, 36 Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev. 387 (1983).
Andrew K. Niebler, Getting the Most Out of Mediation: Toward a Theory of Optimal Compensation for Mediators, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 167 (1999).
Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley, Lawyers, Non-Lawyers, and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 235 (2002).
Gregory B. Northcraft & Margaret A. Neale, Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring-and-Adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions, 39 Organizational Behav. & Hum. Decision Processes 84 (1987).
Martin A. Nowak, et al., Fairness Versus Reason in the Ultimatum Game, 289 Science 1173, 1173 (2000).
J. Nyhard & D. Samarasan, The Elements of Negotiation Management: Using Computers to Help Resolve Conflict, 9 Neg. J. 43 (1987).
Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Negotiating and Drafting the Agreement to Arbitrate in 2003: Insuring Against a Failure of Professional Responsibility, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 271 (2003).
Darren K. Oglesby, Valuing Stock Options in the Marital Context: Speculate, Agree, or Wait and See?, 20 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 39 (2006).
Dan Orr & Chris Guthrie, Anchoring, Information, Expertise, and Negotiation: New Insights from Meta-Analysis, 21 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 597 (2006).
Richard W. Painter, Game Theoretic and Contractarian Paradigms in the Uneasy Relationship Between Regulators and Regulatory Lawyers, 65 Fordham L. Rev. 149 (1996) (contending that lawyers representing regulators and regulated firms can cooperate and improve the regulatory process for their respective clients).
James M. Patell, Roman L. Weil & Mark A. Wolfson, Accumulating Damages in Litigation: The Roles of Uncertainty and Interest Rates, 11 J. Legal Stud. 341 (1982).
John W. Payne, Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocal Analysis, 16 Organizational Behav. & Hum. Performance 366 (1976).
Paul Pecorino & Mark Van Boening, An Empirical Analysis of Bargaining with Voluntary Transmission of Private Information, 33 J. Legal Stud. 131 (2004).
Pepperdine University Institute for Dispute Resolution, Negotiation Planning Instrument, The Course in Negotiation and Claims Settlement for Insurance Professionals (1993), adapted from William F. Lincoln et al., The Course in Collaborative Negotiations (National Center Associates 1985).
Scott R. Peppet, Can Saints Negotiate? A Brief Introduction to the Problems of Perfect Ethics in Bargaining, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 83 (2002).
Scott R. Peppet, Contract Formation In Imperfect Markets: Should We Use Mediators in Deals?, 19 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 283 (2004).
Scott R. Peppet, Contractarian Economics and Mediation Ethics: The Case for Customizing Neutrality Through Contingent Fee Mediation, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 227 (2003).
Scott R. Peppet, Lawyers’ Bargaining Ethics, Contract, and Collaboration: The End of the Legal Profession and the Beginning of Professional Pluralism, 90 Iowa L. Rev. 475 (2005).
Scott R. Peppet, Updating Our Understanding of the Role of Lawyers: Lessons From Mastercard, 12 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 175 (2007)
Michael Pereira, Book Review, Risk Management for the Age of Information – The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century, Robert J. Shiller, Princeton University Press, 2003, 9 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 715 (2004).
Hansel T. Pham, Developing Countries and the WTO: The Need for More Mediation in the DSU, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 331 (2004).
João Pissarra & Jorge C. Jesuino, Idea Generation Through Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity, 20 J. Mgmt. Psychol. 275 (2005).
Scott Plous, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (1993).
I. P. L. P’ng, Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement, and Trial, 14 Bell J. Econ. 539 (1983).
Elizabeth Stewart Poisson, Addressing the Impropriety of Statutory Caps on Pain and Suffering Awards in the Medical Liability System, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 759 (2004).
Jean Poitras, The Paradox of Accepting One’s Share of Responsibility in Mediation, 23 Neg. J. 267 (2007).
A. Mitchell Polinski & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, The Deterrent Effects of Settlements and Trials, 8 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ. 109 (1988).
A. Mitchell Polinski & Steven Shavell, Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (1998).
Lucille M. Ponte & Thomas D. Cavenagh, Alternative Dispute Resolution in Business (1999).
Stephen W. Popper et. al., Shaping the Future, 2005 Sci. Amer. 66 (2005).
Daniel Q. Posin, Mediating International Business Disputes, 9 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 449 (2003).
Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration, 2 J. Legal Stud. 399 (1973).
Richard A. Posner, The Economic Analysis of Law (3rd ed. 1986).
Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (4th ed. 1992).
Richard A. Posner, The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1581 (2005).
Jean Poitras, The Paradox of Accepting One’s Share of Responsibility in Mediation, 23 Neg. J. 267 (2007).
J. Thomas Presby, Practice Ideas for Mediators Who Focus on Commercial Disputes, 21 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 69 (2003).
George L. Priest, Reexamining the Selection Hypothesis, 14 J. Legal Stud. 215 (1985).
George L. Priest, Regulating the Content and Volume of Litigation: An Economic Analysis, 1 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 163 (1982).
George L. Priest & Benjamin Klein, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1984).
George L. Priest, Selective Characteristics of Litigation, 9 J. Legal Stud. 399 (1980).
Matthew Rabin, Incorporating Fairness Into Game Theory and Economics, 83 Am. Econ. Rev. 1281 (1993).
Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Technology’s Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 253 (2006).
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Lawmaking, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 933 (2006).
Jeffery J. Rachlinski, Gains, Losses, and the Psychology of Litigation, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 113 (1996).
Howard Raiffa, Lectures on Negotiation Analysis (1996).
Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation: How Best to Resolve Conflicts and Get the Best Out of Bargaining (1982).
Howard Raiffa et al., Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making (2002).
Susan Summers Raines, Can Online Mediation Be Transformative? Tales from the Front, 4 Conflict Resol. Q. 437 (2005).
Susan S. Raines, Mediating in Your Pajamas: The Benefits and Challenges for ODR Practitioners, 23 Conflict Resol. Q. 359 (2006).
Jennifer M. Ralph, Unconscionable Mediation Clauses: Garrett v. Hooters-Toledo, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 383 (2005).
Eric Rasmusen, Games & Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (2000).
Donald A. Redelmeier & Eldar Shafir, Medical Decision Making in Situations That Offer Multiple Alternatives, 273 JAMA 302 (1993).
Jennifer F. Reinganum & Louis L. Wilde, Settlement, Litigation and the Allocation of Litigation Costs, 17 RAND J. Econ. 557 (1986).
Judith Resnik, Uncovering, Disclosing, and Discovering How the Public Dimensions of Court-Based Processes Are at Risk, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 521 (2006).
Richard C. Reuben, Choppy Waters: Movement Toward a Uniform Confidentiality Privilege Faces Cross-Currents, 5 NO. 2 Disp. Resol. Mag. 4 (1998).
Richard C. Reuben, Confidentiality in Arbitration: Beyond the Myth, 54 Kan. L. Rev. 1255 (2006).
Richard C. Reuben, Court Issues Major Ruling on Mediation Confidentiality, 6 NO. 1 Disp. Resol. Mag. 25 (1999).
Richard C. Reuben, Democracy and Dispute Resolution: Systems Design and the New Workplace, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 11 (2005).
Richard C. Reuben, Harvard Conference Goes Back to Basics: Teaching of Negotiation, 6 NO. 2 Disp. Resol. Mag. 32 (2000).
Richard C. Reuben, Perspectives on the RAND Report: The Dialogue Continues, 3 NO. 4 Disp. Resol. Mag. 3 (1997).
Richard C. Reuben, Public Justice: Toward a State Action Theory of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 85 Cal. L. Rev. 577 (1997).
Richard C. Reuben, States Starting to Offer Legal Protection for Apology, 6 NO. 4 Disp. Resol. Mag. 30 (2000).
Richard C. Reuben, Strictly in Confidence?, 43-NOV Advocate (Idaho) 9 (2000).
Richard C. Reuben, The Closing Courthouse Door: When Arbitration Subverts Democracy By Blocking Access to the Courts, Mandatory Arbitration and Separability Undermine the Rule of Law, Trial, Jan. 2006, at 34.
Richard C. Reuben, Tort Reform Renews Debate Over Mandatory Mediation, 13 NO. 2 Disp. Resol. Mag. 13 (2007).
Robert J. Rhee, A Price Theory of Legal Bargaining: An Inquiry into the Selection of Settlement and Litigation under Uncertainty, 56 Emory L.J. 617 (2007).
Robert J. Rhee, The Application of Finance Theory to Increased Risk Harms in Toxic Tort Litigation, 23 Va. Envtl. L.J. 111 (2004).
Robert J. Rhee, The Effect of Risk on Legal Valuation, 78 U. Colo. L. Rev. 193 (2007).
John Richardson, A Review of Bargaining for Advantage, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 399 (2000).
Robert Ricigliano, Problems without a Process: Using an Action Dialogue to Manage Racial Tensions, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 83 (1999).
Janet Rifkin, Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice of the Fourth Party, 19 Conflict Resol. Q. 117 (2001).
Leonard L. Riskin, The Contemplative Lawyer: On the Potential Contributions of Mindfulness Mediation to Law Students, Lawyers, and their Clients, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Leonard L. Riskin, Decisionmaking in Mediation: The New Old Grid and the New New Grid System, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1 (2003).
Leonard L. Riskin, James E. Westbrook, Chris Guthrie, Timothy J. Heinsz, Richard C. Reuben, & Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Dispute Resolution and Lawyers (3rd ed. 2005).
Leonard L. Riskin, Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques, 12 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 111 (1994).
Leonard L. Riskin, The Represented Client in a Settlement Conference: The Lessons of G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 69 Wash. U. L.Q. 1059 (1991).
Leonard L. Riskin, Retiring and Replacing the Grid of Mediator Orientations, 21 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 69 (2003).
Leonard L. Riskin, Symposium: Mediation Quandaries, 24 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 1007 (1997).
Leonard L. Riskin, Teaching and Learning from the Mediations in Barry Werth’s Damages, 2004 J. Disp. Resol. 119 (2004).
Leonard L. Riskin, Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed, 1 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 7 (1996).
Leonard L. Riskin, Who Decides What? Rethining the Grid of Mediator Orientations, Disp. Resol. Mag., Winter 2003, at 22.
Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 460 (2003) (finding that “full” apologies increase the likelihood of settlement but “partial” apologies that are mere expressions of sympathy can actually decrease the likelihood of settlement).
Peter Robinson, Contending With Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: A Cautiously Cooperative Approach to Mediation Advocacy, 50 Baylor L.R. 963, 964 (“Mediation is facilitated negotiation.”).
Peter Robinson, Arthur Pearlstein & Bernard Mayer, DyADS: Encouraging “Dynamic Adaptive Dispute Systems” in the Organized Workplace, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 339 (2005).
Nancy H. Rogers & Craig A. McEwen, Employing the Law to Increase the Use of Mediation and to Encourage Direct and Early Negotiations, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 831 (1998).
Donald Lee Rome, Resolving Business Disputes: Fact-Finding and Impasse, 55-JAN Disp. Resol. J. 8 (2001).
Paul Rosenberger, Laisse-“Fair”: An Argument for the Status Quo Ethical Constraints on Lawyers as Negotiators, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 611 (1998).
D.L. Rosenhan, On Being Sane in Insane Places, 179 Science 250 (1973).
Laurence Ross, Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustments (1970).
Lee Ross & Andrew Ward, Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution, in 27 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 255, 278-84 (Mark P. Zanna ed., 1995).
Lee Ross, Reactive Devaluation in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution 26 (Kenneth Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Erin Ryan, The Discourse Beneath: Emotional Epistemology in Legal Deliberation and Negotiation, 10 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 231 (2005).
Erin Ryan, Zoning, Taking, and Dealing: The Problems and Promise of Bargaining in Land Use Planning Conflicts, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 337 (2002).
Jeswald W. Salacuse, Renegotiating Existing Agreements: How to Deal with “Life Struggling Against Form”, 17 Neg. J. 311 (2001).
William F. Samuelson, Computer-Aided Negotiation and Economic Analysis, 11 Neg. J. 135 (1995).
William F. Samuelson & Max H. Bazerman, The Winner’s Curse in Bilateral Negotiations, in 3 Research in Experimental Economics 105 (Vernon L. Smith ed., 1985).
Frank E.A. Sander & Stephen B. Goldberg, Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure, 10 Neg. J. 49 (1994).
Frank E.A. Sander, The Future of ADR, 2000 J. Disp. Resol. 3 (2000).
Frank E.A. Sander & Lukasz Rozdeiczer, Matching Cases and Dispute Resolution Procedures: Detailed Analysis Leading to a Mediation-Centered Approach, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2006).
Frank E.A. Sander, Stephen B. Goldberg & Nancy Rogers, The Teaching of ADR in the 21st Century Law School, 19 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 29 (2001).
David M. Saunders & Roy J. Lewicki, Teaching Negotiation with Computer Simulations: Pedagogical and Practical Considerations, 11 Neg. J. 157 (1995).
Kathleen M. Scanlon, Mediator’s Deskbook (1999).
Burkhard Schafer & Olav K. Wiegand, Incompetent, Prejudiced and Lawless? A Gestalt-Psychological Perspective on Fact Finding in Law as Learning, 3 Law, Probability & Risk 93 (2004).
Frederick Schauer, Do Cases Make Bad Law?, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 883 (2006).
Amy J. Schmitz, Refreshing Contractual Analysis of ADR Agreements By Curing Bipolar Avoidance of Modern Common Law, 9 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2004).
Suzanne J. Schmitz, What Should We Teach in ADR Courses?: Concepts and Skills for Lawyers Representing Clients in Mediation, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 189 (2001).
Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Building a Pedagogy of Problem-Solving: Learning to Choose Among ADR Processes, 5 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 113 (2000).
Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Shattering Negotiation Myths: Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 125 (2002).
Kirk W. Schuler, Note, ADR’s Biggest Compromise, 54 Drake L. Rev. 751 (2006).
L. Wayne Scott, The Law of Mediation in Texas, 37 St. Mary’s L.J. 325 (2006).
James K. Sebenis, Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review, 38 Mgmt. Sci. 18 (1992).
Jeffrey M. Senger, Decision Analysis in Negotiation, 87 Marq. L. Rev. 723 (2004).
Jeffrey R. Seul, Settling Significant Cases, 79 Wash. L. Rev. 881 (2004).
Eldar Shafir & Amos Tversky, Decision Making, in Foundations of Cognitive Psychology §26.6, at 614 (Daniel J. Levitin ed., 2002).
Neil Shah, Negotiation through the Lens of a Social Psychologist, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 313 (1999).
Melvin F. Shakum, Restructuring a Negotiation with Evolutionary Systems Design, 11 Neg. J. 145 (1995).
Khalil Z. Shariff, Designing Institutions to Manage Conflict: Principles for the Problem Solving Organization, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 133 (2003).
Steven Shavell, Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis, 24 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1995).
Steven Shavell, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (2004).
Steven Shavell, The Fundamental Divergence Between the Private and the Social Motive to Use the Legal System, 26 J. Legal Stud. 575 (1997).
Steven Shavell, On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts, 22 J.L. Econ. & Org. 289 (2006).
Steven Shavell, Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis Under Alternative Methods for Allocation of Legal Costs, 11 J. Legal Stud. 55 (1982).
Steven Shavell, The Social Versus the Private Incentive to Bring Suit in a Costly Legal System, 11 J. Legal Stud. 333 (1982).
G. Richard Shell, Bargaining Styles and Negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument in Negotiation Training, 17 Neg. J. 155 (2001).
G. Richard Shell, Computer-Assisted Negotiation and Mediation: Where We Are and Where We Are Going, 11 Neg. J. 117 (1995).
William K. Slate II, Online Dispute Resolution: Click Here To Settle Your Dispute, 56-JAN Disp. Resol. J. 8 (2001).
Matthew A. Smith, et al., Arbitration of Patent Infringement and Validity Issues Worldwide, 19 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 299 (2006).
Edward A. Snyder & James W. Hughes, The English Rule for Allocating Legal Costs: Evidence Confronts Theory, 6 J.L. Econ. & Org. 345 (1990).
Louis Solomon, Achieving Optimal Evaluation of Business and Commercial Cases, 21 NO. 2 Corp. Couns. 3 (2006).
Louis M. Solomon & Bruce E. Fader, Case Evaluation, in 2005 Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, Section of Litigation, American Bar Association.
Louis M. Solomon, Quantitative Techniques For Case Evaluation And Their Limitations, The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, Oct. 2006, at 21.
Carl S. Spetzler & Stael von Holstein, Probability Encoding in Decision Analysis, 22 Mgmt. Science 340 (1975).
Anthony Wanis St. John, Toward the Next Generation of Research on Mediation and Third-Party Intervention, 12 Neg. J. 271 (1996).
Linda R. Stanley & Don L. Coursey, Empirical Evidence on the Selection Hypothesis and the Decision to Litigate or Settle, 19 J. Legal Stud. 145 (1990).
James H. Stark, The Ethics of Mediation Evaluation: Some Troublesome Questions and Tentative Proposals, From an Evaluative Lawyer Mediator, 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 769 (1997).
Neil Steiner, Dispute Resolution or Coercion: A Critique of the Six-Year Rule in Securities Arbitration, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 207 (1997).
Jeffrey W. Stempel, The Inevitability of the Eclectic: Liberating ADR from Ideology, 2000 J. Disp. Resol. 247 (2000).
Jean R. Sternlight, Lawyers’ Representation of Clients in Mediation: Using Economics and Psychology to Structure Advocacy in a Nonadversarial Setting, 14 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 269 (1999).
Tom Stilwell, Correcting Errors: Imperfect Awards in Texas Arbitration, 58 Baylor L. Rev. 467 (2006).
Thomas J. Stipanowich, ADR and ‘The Vanishing Trial’, 10 NO. 4 Disp. Resol. Mag. 7 (2004).
Thomas J. Stipanowich, Construction ADR Undergoes A Sea Change, 14 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 69 (1996).
Thomas J. Stipanowich, Contract and Conflict Management, 2001 Wis. L. Rev. 831 (2001).
Thomas J. Stipanowich, Education and the Culture of Conflict Management, 19 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 32 (2001).
Thomas J. Stipanowich, Publisher’s View on ‘The Costs of Arbitration’, 20 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 103 (2002).
Laura A. Stoll, Casenote, “We Decline to Address”: Resolving the Unanswered Questions left to Encourage Mediation and Prevent the Improper Shielding of Evidence, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 1549 (2006).
Joseph B. Stulberg, Evaluative Versus Facilitative Mediator Orientations: Piercing the “Grid” Lock, 24 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 985 (1997).
Lawrence Susskind & Carri Hulet, The Practice of Public Dispute Resolution: Measuring the Dollar Value of the Field, 23 Neg. J. 355 (2007).
Richard Susskin, Transforming the Law: Essays on Technology, Justice and the Legal Marketplace (2000).
Cass R. Sunstein, Book Review, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1119 (2002) (reviewing Paul Slovic, The Perception of Risk (2000) and arguing generally that policy should be driven by statistical evidence of risk rather than human judgments about risk).
Cass R. Sunstein, Illusory Losses, 37 J. Legal Stud. S157 (2008).
Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Klaus Weber, The High Cost of Accurate Knowledge, Harv. Bus. Rev., May 2003, at 74.
George Steven Swan, Economics and the Litigation Funding Industry: How Much Justice Can You Afford?, 35 New Eng. L. Rev. 805 (2001).
David Syme, Keeping Pace: On-line Technology and ADR Services, 23 Conflict Resol. Q. 343 (2006).
Symposium, ADR and the Vanishing Trial, Disp. Resol. Mag., Summer 2004.
Kent D. Syverud, On the Demand for Liability Insurance, 72 Tex. L. Rev. 1629 (1994).
Shelley E. Taylor & Jonathon D. Brown, Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health, 103 Psychol. Bull. 193 (1988).
Richard H. Thaler, An Economic Theory of Self-Control, in Quasi-Rational Economics 77 (Richard H. Thaler ed., 1991).
Richard H. Thaler & H. M. Shefrin, An Economic Theory of Self-Control, 89 J. Pol. Econ. 392 (1981).
C. William Thomas, Gurus and Guerrillas: Religious Fundamentalism and Dispute Resolution, 4 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 115 (1999).
Leigh Thompson, Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Issues, 108 Psychol. Bull. 515 (1990).
Leigh Thompson & Reid Hastie, Social Perception in Negotiation, 47 Organizational Behav. & Hum. Decision Processes 98 (1990).
Peter M. Todd & Gerd Gigerenzer, Precis of Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, 23 Behav. & Brain Sci. 727 (2000).
Avishalom Tor & Max H. Bazerman, Focusing Failures in Competitive Environments: Explaining Decision Errors in the Monty Hall Game, the Acquiring a Company Problem, and Multi-Party Ultimatums, 16 J. Behav. Decision Making 353 (2003) (showing that decisionmakers make systematic errors in competitive games because they fail to take into account the impact of information held only by other parties on the decisions likely to be made by these other parties in light of the rules of the game).
Avishalom Tor, The Fable of Entry: Bounded Rationality, Market Discipline, and Legal Policy, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 482 (2002).
David M. Trubek et al., The Costs of Ordinary Litigation, 31 UCLA L. Rev. 72 (1983).
Thomas Tso, Mediation’s Boundaries: In Re Licensure of Penny v. State ex rel. Wyoming, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 453 (2006).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty, 5 J. Risk & Uncertainty 297 (1992).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky eds., 1982).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, 185 Science 1124 (1974).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model, 106 Q.J. Econ. 1039 (1991).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions, 59 J. Bus. S251 (1986).
Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, 211 Science 453 (1981).
Melissa Conley Tyler and Susan S. Raines, The Human Face of On-line Dispute Resolution, 23 Conflict Resol. Q. 333 (2006).
Jacob W. Ulvila & Rex V. Brown, Decision Analysis Comes of Age, Harv. Bus. Rev., Sept.-Oct. 1982, at 357 (1982).
John J. Upchurch, Florida Firm Trains and Leverages Its New Mediation Associates, 20 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 1 (2002).
William L. Ury, Getting Past NO: Negotiating Your Way From Confrontation to Cooperation (1991).
William L. Ury, Jeanne M. Brett & Stephen B. Goldberg, Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict (1993).
Jane VanLare, From Protection to Favoritism? The Federal Policy Toward Arbitration Vis-à-Vis Competing State Policies, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 473 (2006).
Samson Vermont, The Economics of Patent Litigation, in From Ideas to Assets: Investing Wisely in Intellectual Property 327 (Bruce Berman ed., 2002).
Marc B. Victor, A New Use for Decision Trees and Risk Analysis: Choosing An Optimum Fee Arrangement, 1 Managing Lit. Costs 8 (1994).
Marc B. Victor, Decision Trees Take Guesswork Out of Contingency-Fee Proposals, 2 Managing Lit. Costs (1995). Available at www.litigationrisk.com/LRA%20for%20Defendant%20Contingent%20Fee.pdf (last accessed Apr. 18, 2007).
Marc B. Victor et al., Evaluating Legal Risks and Costs with Decision Tree Analysis, in Successful Partnering Between Inside and Outside Counsel §12:20 (Robert L. Haig ed., 2000) (instructing lawyers to consider the “high,” “low,” and “most likely” jury verdict to arrive at an appropriate assessment).
Marc B. Victor, How Much is a Case Worth?, Trial, July 1984, at 48.
Marc B. Victor, Interpreting A Decision Tree Analysis of A Lawsuit (2001). Available at www.litigationrisk.com/Reading%20a%20Tree.pdf (last accessed Apr. 18, 2007).
Marc B. Victor, Litigation Risk Analysis and ADR, in ADR Practice Book (John H. Wilkinson ed., 1990). Available at www.litigationrisk.com/Litigation%20Risk%20Analysis(tm)%20and%20ADR.pdf (last accessed Apr. 18, 2007).
Marc B. Victor, The Proper Use of Decision Analysis to Assist Litigation Strategy, 40 Bus. Law. 617 (1985).
Marc B. Victor, Risk Evaluation in Intellectual Property Litigation, in Intellectual Property Counseling and Litigation (2002). Available at www.litigationrisk.com/Risk%20Evaluation%20in%20IP%20Litigation%20(web).pdf (last accessed Apr. 18, 2007).
James A. Wall, Jr. et al, Mediation: A Current Review and Theory Development, 45 J. Conflict Resol. 370 (2001).
Margaret Ward, Public Fuss in a Private Forum, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 217 (1997).
Stephen J. Ware & Sarah Rudolph Cole, Introduction: ADR in Cyberspace, 15 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 589 (2000).
Michael D. Watkins, Teaching Students to Shape the Game: Negotiation Architecture and the Design of Manageably Dynamic Simulations, 23 Neg. J. 333 (2007).
Brian D. Weber, Note, Contractual Waivers of a Right to Jury Trial—Another Option, 53 Clev. St. L. Rev. 717 (2006).
Ian Weinstein, Don’t Believe Everything You Think: Cognitive Bias in Legal Decision Making, 9 Clinical L. Rev. 783 (2003).
Joshua N. Weiss, You Didn’t Just Say That! Quotes, Quips, and Proverbs for Dealing in the World of Conflict and Negotiation, Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse 2005, at 1 (copies are available free of charge through the Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse Website at www.pon.org).
Nancy A. Welsh, Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got to Do With It?, 79 Wash. U. L.Q. 787 (2001).
Nancy A. Welsh, The Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Price of Institutionalization?, 6 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2001).
Maureen A. Weston, Confidentiality’s Constitutionality: The Incursion on Judicial Powers to Regulate Party Conduct in Court-Connected Mediation, 8 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 29 (2003).
Maureen A. Weston, Universes Colliding: The Constitutional Implications of Arbitral Class Actions, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1711 (2006).
Gerald Wetlaufer, The Ethics of Lying in Negotiations, 75 Iowa L. Rev. 1219 (1990).
Michael Wheeler, Computers and Negotiation: Backing into the Future, 11 Neg. J. 169 (1995).
Robert B. Wilson, Strategic and Informational Barriers to Negotiation, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution 108 (Kenneth Arrow et al. eds., 1995).
Timothy D. Wilson & Jonathan W. Schooler, Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions, 60 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 181 (1991).
Robert K. Wise, Mediation in Texas: Can the Judge Really Make Me Do That?, 47 S. Tex. L. Rev. 849 (2006).
Roselle L. Wissler, Barriers to Attorneys’ Discussion and Use of ADR, 19 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 459 (2004).
Andrew J. Wistrich, Chris Guthrie & Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1251 (2005).
Donald Wittman, Dispute Resolution, Bargaining, and the Selection of Cases for Trial: A Study of the Generation of Biased and Unbiased Data, 17 J. Legal Stud. 313 (1988).
Donald Wittman, Is the Selection of Cases for Trial Biased?, 14 J. Legal Stud. 185 (1985).
Benjamin J.C. Wolf, Note, On-Line But Out of Touch: Analyzing International Dispute Resolution Through the Lens of the Internet, 14 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 281 (2006).
Caryn Litt Wolfe, Note, Faith-Based Arbitration: Friend or Foe? An Evaluation of Religious Arbitration Systems and Their Interaction With Secular Courts, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 427 (2006).
Rachel H. Yarkon, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Lawyers: Negotiating Settlement of Gender Discrimination Claims Arising from Termination of Employment, 2 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 165 (1997).
Albert Yoon & Tom Baker, Offer-of-Judgment Rules and Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study of Automobile Insurance Litigation in the East, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 155 (2006).
Paula M. Young, Rejoice! Rejoice! Rejoice, Give Thanks, and Sing: ABA, ACR, and AAA Adopt Revised Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators, 5 Appalachian J.L. 195 (2006).
Stephen P. Younger, Effective Representation of Corporate Clients in Mediation, 59 Alb. L. Rev. 951 (1996).
Peter D. Zeughauser, Price & Product: A Proposal for A Focused ADR Structure, 15 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 141 (1997).