Since the end of the last survey period, the Supreme Court issued a significant decision holding that defendants in Rule 10b-5 securities fraud actions could not defeat class certification by contesting the materiality of the alleged misrepresentations. Shortly thereafter, the Fifth Circuit applied this holding to bar securities fraud defendants from contesting class certification by arguing that the alleged misrepresentations did not affect the stock price. The Fifth Circuit also addressed several...
Introduction: The Supreme Court in 2011
In 2011, the Supreme Court revisited two thorny personal jurisdiction concepts – general jurisdiction, on which it had only written two previous opinions, and specific jurisdiction based on a “stream of commerce” theory. The Court had previously found general jurisdiction when a company had its headquarters in the forum state, Perkins v. Benguet Consol. Mining, 342 U.S. 437 (1952), and rejected general jurisdiction based on a company’s pattern of purchases...
In an Administrative Order dated September 16 , 2013, the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts of New York State, Hon. A. Gail Prudenti, designated Hon. Charles E. Ramos, Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, to handle all international arbitration cases before the Commercial Division, New York County, including those brought under CPLR Article75 or under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. There is an exception for matters with no transnational component arising entirely...
The legal framework governing Mexico’s energy industry celebrated its 75th birthday this year. But the adage, “the older the violin, the sweeter the music” would not apply in this case.
Mexico is facing an epic production crisis and its oil and gas industry is in desperate need of capital, technology and technical expertise to turn the situation around. Over the past eight years, crude oil production has declined rapidly, dropping from a peak of 3.4 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2004...
I. Power To Sanction
Courts generally enjoy power to enforce procedural rules and orders by various means, such as fines, adverse inferences, cost/fee awards, preclusion of evidence, and even default judgment. Surprisingly, when arbitrators employ such measures, they enter a legal frontier of unsettled law. Why? An arbitrator’s procedural power derives from private contract, not public law, and arbitration contracts almost never overtly address the arbitrator’s power to remedy party misbehavior....
Metropolitan Corporate Counsel Editor: Why has CPR introduced administered arbitration rules?
Bryan: For over 30 years, top-flight global lawyers have used CPR’s non-administered rules to resolve commercial disputes. In response to users’ requests, CPR is now offering administered arbitration rules for those requiring an administering authority. They became effective July 1, 2013. With more worldwide companies signing CPR’s Corporate Policy Statement on Alternatives to Litigation and the 21st...
The pro-arbitration foreign anti-suit injunction is not mentioned in the text of the New York Convention or the U.S. Arbitration Act (FAA). But its importance to the enforcement of agreements to arbitrate transnational disputes is considerable. To be reminded of this, read a recent New York federal district court decision granting such an injunction:Bailey Shipping Ltd. v. American Bureau of Shipping, 2013 WL 5312540 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2013). Or continue reading this Commentary.
A definitional...