Texas Fourth Appellate Court: Because the United States Supreme Court recently held in Stolt-Nielson that a party cannot be compelled to submit to class arbitration absent its express consent, the trial court erred by denying NCP’s motion to compel individual arbitration and by permitting Escatiola to seek class certification before the arbitrator
By Don Philbin, April 27, 2011
This post has been viewed 2,026 times.
This post has been viewed 2,026 times.
Texas Fourth Appellate Court: Because the United States Supreme Court recently held in Stolt-Nielson that a party cannot be compelled to submit to class arbitration absent its express consent, the trial court erred by denying NCP’s motion to compel individual arbitration and by permitting Escatiola to seek class certification before the arbitrator www.4thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopinion.asp?OpinionId=23867
Read original articleTags: Arbitration
Related Posts
What Constitutes Arbitration for Federal Arbitration Act Purposes?
June 24, 2014
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16, codifies the federal policy of enforcing arbitration agreements....
June 24, 2014
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16, codifies the federal policy of enforcing arbitration agreements....
Judge Posner Sarcastically Applauds ‘New Form of Arbitration’ After Garner’s Expert Evaluates Tiff
May 22, 2014
Legal Times published Posner’s response in a second article. “Please convey my congratulations to Bryan Garner on inventing...
May 22, 2014
Legal Times published Posner’s response in a second article. “Please convey my congratulations to Bryan Garner on inventing...
Rethinking the Arbitration Clause
May 19, 2014
We’ve discussed the ins and outs of arbitration at length previously. I’ve spent the last few years in a number of arbitration...
May 19, 2014
We’ve discussed the ins and outs of arbitration at length previously. I’ve spent the last few years in a number of arbitration...
