Marc J. Goldstein Litigation & Arbitration Chambers: A Sensible Non-Application of Functus Officio to Divergent Partial and Final Awards
By Don Philbin, December 29, 2010
This post has been viewed 1,913 times.
This post has been viewed 1,913 times.
Marc J. Goldstein Litigation & Arbitration Chambers: A Sensible Non-Application of Functus Officio to Divergent Partial and Final Awards arbblog.lexmarc.us/2010/12/a-sensible-non-application-of-functus-officio-to-divergent-partial-and-final-awards/
Read original articleTags: Arbitration
Related Posts
What Constitutes Arbitration for Federal Arbitration Act Purposes?
June 24, 2014
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16, codifies the federal policy of enforcing arbitration agreements....
June 24, 2014
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16, codifies the federal policy of enforcing arbitration agreements....
Judge Posner Sarcastically Applauds ‘New Form of Arbitration’ After Garner’s Expert Evaluates Tiff
May 22, 2014
Legal Times published Posner’s response in a second article. “Please convey my congratulations to Bryan Garner on inventing...
May 22, 2014
Legal Times published Posner’s response in a second article. “Please convey my congratulations to Bryan Garner on inventing...
Rethinking the Arbitration Clause
May 19, 2014
We’ve discussed the ins and outs of arbitration at length previously. I’ve spent the last few years in a number of arbitration...
May 19, 2014
We’ve discussed the ins and outs of arbitration at length previously. I’ve spent the last few years in a number of arbitration...
