Pat K. Chew, Judge Quint A. Salmon and Anne Salmon Chaired Professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, has published “Contextual Analysis in Arbitration,” SMU Law Review, Vol. 70, p. 837, 2017; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-28. In her journal article, Professor Chew examines the potential advantages one party may have over the other in two distinct areas of arbitration.
The abstract states:
The arbitration process is embedded in a much...
We’ve discussed various issues concerning the allocation of asbestos or hazardous waste claims by insurers or cedents in situations where losses occur in multiple policy periods over time. (See here, here, & here.) Issues relating to allocation of such claims have, for many years, arisen in both insurance coverage cases and reinsurance litigation and arbitration, and they still do.
Earlier this year in Keyspan Gas East Corp. v. Munich Reins. Am., Inc., ___ N.Y.3d ___, N.Y. Slip Op. 2116...
The Northern District of Texas has accepted the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge and confirmed an arbitration award of more than $141 million in a software licensing dispute. In Kemper Corp. Svcs., Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corp. and DXC Tech. Co., No. 3:17-CV-2769-S (N.D. Tex., September 18, 2018), an insurance company, Kemper, entered into a multi-year contract to license software from Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”) in 2009. As part of the contract, CSC agreed...
Like federal law, California state arbitration law generally recognizes the separability doctrine, whereby arbitration clauses are viewed as separate from the rest of a contract and not necessarily impacted by defects in the larger contract containing the arbitration clause. For example, general allegations of fraudulent inducement with respect to the larger contract do not invalidate the obligation to arbitrate and are decided by an arbitrator. It’s as if the arbitration clause has some immunity,...
Uber drivers hoping to be treated as employees may have to go it alone. A federal appeals court in San Francisco has overturned a ruling that would have allowed drivers to pursue their case as a class action lawsuit instead of going through individual arbitration (which, historically, favors companies over complainants). Judge Richard Clifton cited precedent as the reason, including both another ruling in favor of Uber from 2016 as well as a Supreme Court decision from May that said companies could...
The First Circuit just faced a fascinating formation issue: if a customer cannot see what she is signing, and no employee reads it to her or ensures she knows there are legal terms, is there a contract? With Justice Souter sitting by designation on the panel, the court answered “no,” and thereby kept a class action in the courts. National Federation of the Blind v. The Container Store, Inc., 2018 WL 4378174 (1st Cir. Sept. 14, 2018).
The Container Store case involves blind plaintiffs who allege...
In today’s post I recount an epic battle between the Rules of Professional Conduct (tagline: saving clients from unscrupulous lawyers for over 100 years!) and the Uniform Arbitration Act (tagline: saving arbitration from hostile judges for 60 years!) in the Supreme Court of California. Spoiler alert: the Rules of Professional Conduct win.
The story in Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Manufacturing Co.,2018 WL 4137103 (Cal. Aug. 30, 2018), begins with a “large law firm”...