How changes of ICSID procedure can be achieved?
The ICSID Convention itself contains several procedural rules which regulate the conduct of arbitral proceedings. Amendment of these rules is, however, difficult as a matter of public international law. However, ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings, which are incorporated by parties into their arbitration clauses by reference, can be amended more easily, upon the approval of a majority of two-thirds of the Member States. This seems...
You know what rarely rises to the top of my “to do” list? Reading scholarly articles and studies about arbitration. Blech. But, since I haven’t seen any good court decisions lately, it is time to visit the neglected pile of articles. Turns out, I should have read some of them right away. Below are summaries of five new-ish articles that have crossed my desk. A few offer peeks into arbitration data that is generally not available and some conclusions to chew on over this Thanksgiving...
There are only four ways to avoid an arbitration agreement. You can prove: 1) it was never formed; 2) it was formed, but is invalid under state law; 3) the current dispute is outside the scope of it; or 4) the other party waived their right to arbitrate (through litigation conduct). Today’s post is about the third method. Because of the federal presumption in favor of arbitrability, which applies when courts are determining whether the parties’ dispute falls within the scope of the clause,...
Frauke Nitschke, Team Leader and Legal Counsel on one of the Case Management Teams at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes has published “The ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice,” Forthcoming, Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, edited by Catharine Titi and Katia Fach Gómes (Oxford University Press 2018). In her book chapter, Ms. Nitschke describes and analyzes the conciliation process and procedure that is currently in place...
In a recent decision from the 11th Circuit, the court found that an arbitration agreement printed on the outside wrapper of a package of roofing shingles is fully enforceable if a consumer purchases, opens, and retains the product. Dye v. Tamko Bldg. Prod., Inc., No. 17-14052 (11th Cir. Nov. 2, 2018) (click here for a copy of the decision). A picture of the packaging appears on this blog page, although the print is too tiny to view with this low quality picture. It appears that one entire side...
Another day, another arbitration compelled, this time in a recent case out of the Northern District of Illinois, Nitka v. ERJ Dining IV, LLC, Case No. 18 cv 3279. The plaintiff sued the defendant for sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and assault and battery. The defendant countered that the plaintiff had signed an agreement to arbitrate disputes relating to her employment, which these were. The plaintiff stated she had no memory of signing the arbitration agreement, but the defendant's Vice...
Alison Frankel has a write-up of A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc v. Hunter, No. SC96672, a case out of Missouri that refuses to substitute an arbitrator when the arbitrator named in the arbitration clause is no longer available (in this case, the specified National Arbitration Forum no longer provides arbitration services on consumer loans like in the contract at issue here). This is yet another court weighing in on a split that's developed: Can arbitration be compelled when the arbitration clause specified...
A lawsuit targeting electric scooter-sharing companies seizes on the dangers of zipping around town on two wheels and brings gory detail to one of the more polarizing technology trends to emerge over the last year.
Nine people who were injured by electric scooters filed the class-action suit on Oct. 19 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. It accuses startups Bird Rides Inc. and Lime – as well as their manufacturers Xiaomi Corp. and Segway Inc. – of gross negligence, claiming the companies...
Having lost in the Ninth Circuit, Big Fish tried to invoke its arbitration clause and compel arbitration. The court says:
Churchill Downs waived its right to arbitration when it took its first bite of the apple and chewed thoroughly for over three years.
Ouch! The court says that the terms don’t unequivocally delegate the issue of waiver to the arbitrator, so the court must decide it. As to waiver, Churchill Downs took acts inconsistent with its putative right to arbitrate by litigating the case...