Allegations of fraud and corruption are increasingly encountered in international arbitrations but there is at times a perception that international arbitration, which is by nature a private and consensual dispute resolution mechanism, is ill-equipped to handle the challenges thrown up by such allegations. This is particularly so when looking at arbitral procedure. Is this perception justified or is international arbitration flexible enough a tool to overcome these challenges?
Is a dispute concerning...
Texas’ Fourth Court of Appeals has ordered two companies to arbitrate a contract dispute related to the construction of airplane hangars in Mexico. In IBS Asset Liquidations LLC v. Servicios Multiples Del NorteSA de CV, No. 04-13-00273-CV (Tex. App. – San Antonio 2013), IBS Asset Liquidations LLC, formerly known as Icon Building Systems, LLC, (“Icon”) agreed to design and build an airplane hangar for Servicios Multiples Del Norte SA de CV (“Servicios”). As part of the agreement,...
"If lawyers are allowed to wine and dine arbitrators [and not disclose that information], some pressure comes to bear," Susan Hays, an Austin solo who represents the plaintiffs in Patten, told the court.
University of Missouri School of Law Professor S. I. Strong has published Increasing Legalism in International Commercial Arbitration: A New Theory of Causes, a New Approach to Cures, 7 World Arbitration and Mediation Review 117 (2013); University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-26. In her paper, Professor Strong discusses several possible explanations for an increased use of legalistic procedures in the realm of international commercial arbitration as well as potential...
Faced with a question of first impression, the Ninth Circuit recently held that a clause in an arbitration agreement that eliminates any and all federal court review of arbitration awards, including review under § 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act, is unenforeceable. The Court reasoned that allowing parties to “contractually eliminate all judicial review of arbitration awards . . . run[s] counter to the text of the FAA,” and “would also frustrate Congress’s attempt to ensure a minimum level...
S. I. Strong, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution at the University of Missouri School of Law has authored an interesting article entitled Limits of Procedural Choice of Law, 39 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 2014, Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-03. In her publication, Professor Strong examines the role of procedural, as opposed to substantive, law using international commercial arbitration proceedings...
Certain amendments to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective December 1, 2013. This is the Rule governing all aspects of obtaining evidence from non-parties by subpoena in federal civil proceedings. The amendments have potential relevance to arbitral practice for arbitrations that have their seat in the United States, as Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act (”FAA”) in certain respects equates arbitral subpoena power with judicial subpoena power, and in certain...
The last two segments of this Small Business B-2-B Arbitration series have focused on certain key structural aspects of pre-dispute arbitration agreements. Perhaps some might think that an examination of even the most basic structural components of arbitration agreements is too much information for a business person, but most successful business people know about all relevant aspects of the contracts they negotiate, not just the basic structural components of those contracts (e.g., price and performance...