Contract interpretation is an important subject for lawyers but there are few rigorous economic analyses. We use a formal model to derive the interpretive rule that an “ideal” legal enforcer would adopt. Commercial parties make contracts to maximize gains from trade. Our enforcer is ideal, in the sense that he interprets contracts to maximize welfare over the set of contracting relationships. We then compare how actual interpretation matches the ideal. We derive the following results, among others:...
We develop a model with asymmetric information, in which the uninformed party makes the offer. When the parties proceed to trial, their endogenous expenditures partially determine the outcome. The endogenous spending at trial can either strengthen or weaken the bargaining position of the uninformed party with the player types who settle. When the bargaining position is strengthened, some standard results on information transmission prior to trial may be overturned. The recipient of the offer with...
Since 2000, the World intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has provided arbitration services for alleged cybersquatting disputes. Cybersquatting is the abusive registering and trafficking in internet domain names to drive up profits using the goodwill created by another company or entity. WIPO reportedly began empowering arbitrators from its Arbitration and Mediation Center to award domain names to others in situations where an entity acquired or registered the website abusively.
The...
This survey examines significant business torts decisions by Texas courts for the period from March 2012 through February 2013. “Business torts” obviously covers a broad spectrum, and in narrowing the survey, we included cases that either decided new issues or examined issues of particular interest to business litigators. During the survey period, Texas courts addressed: (1) the meaning of restoration under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices – Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”); (2) the circumstances...
While all arbitrators aim for the highest level of quality control, errors occur. Sometimes these errors are pretty egregious, which is why we always recommend using a trusted and well-respected ADR provider and arbitrator.
In a recent case coming out of Michigan, the Thomas Kinkade art company alleged that one of its dealers failed to pay for art it received. The dealer counterclaimed that Kinkade had fraudulently induced it to enter the dealership agreement. The matter went to arbitration...
Last year just over 2 million American couples tied the knot. In the same time 800,000 married couples filed for divorce, underscoring the oft-quoted statistic that nearly half of all marriages will end in a split. If you look at all that activity as an industry (weddings are, after all), it’s a big one—estimated at $30 billion in attorney fees alone.
So it’s not entirely surprising that the enterprising startup set are looking to get in on the action.
One new entry to the landscape is less...