Here are three simple conceptual tools that might help us see in front of our noses: nexus causality, moral warfare, and misattribution arbitrage. Causality itself is an evolved conceptual tool that simplifies, schematizes, and focuses our representation of situations. This cognitive machinery guides us to think in terms of the cause — of an outcome having a single cause. Yet for enlarged understanding, it is more accurate to represent outcomes as caused by an intersection or nexus of factors...
Not quite a decade ago, an experienced British Airways captain publicly complained about his airline's orders banning manual thrust control by its Airbus crews in normal flight.
Captain Malcolm Scott feared pilots would end up less prepared to fly the aircraft manually. He wrote in a pilots' publication: "This ban is likely to lead to further deskilling and further increase in errors. Without a significant change in the airline's policy, the inevitable response will be a complete ban on manual...
The trolley problem is a thought experiment in ethics, first introduced by Philippa Foot in 1967, but also extensively analysed by Judith Jarvis Thomson, Peter Unger, and Frances Kamm as recently as 1996. Outside of the domain of traditional philosophical discussion, the trolley problem has been a significant feature in the fields of cognitive science and, more recently, of neuroethics. It has also been a topic on various TV shows dealing with human psychology.
The general form...
A computer that works like the human brain? It may not be that far off.
IBM cognitive computing researchers are one step closer to making a brain-like computer a reality. The team on Thursday unveiled a "breakthrough software ecosystem" that has the ability to program microchips with architecture based on the human brain.
The framework, which includes new programming language and algorithms, is just part of the process that principal investigator Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha hopes will lead...
The rest of us, by contrast, often engage in a kind of tacit chronological exceptionalism. Unlike all those suckers who fell for the flat earth or the geocentric universe or cold fusion or the cosmological constant, we ourselves have the great good luck to be alive during the very apex of accurate human thought. The literary critic Harry Levin put this nicely: "The habit of equating one's age with the apogee of civilization, one's town with the hub of the universe, one's horizons with the limits...
In early 2000 I got to study a very interesting Italian company called Ducati Corse. And what this company does is racing motorcycles. It’s a very important business for them because what they do during the races actually translates in sales of commercial bikes. What is interesting is that in 2003 this company entered a new type of competition called MotoGP. And they decided that this was gonna be a learning season where they would collect a lot of data to try to understand how to make...
While some remain skeptical, many value neuroscience to help explain why mediation techniques work and to provide insights into what may be most helpful to address challenging situations. In a brief overview of neuroscience, examples such as priming and framing show how standard mediation moves can be understood in a neuroscience framework.
Daily Report (June 24, 2013).
Are judicial rulings based solely on laws and facts? Legal formalism holds that judges apply legal reasons to the facts of a case in a rational, mechanical, and deliberative manner. In contrast, legal realists argue that the rational application of legal reasons does not sufficiently explain the decisions of judges and that psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings. We test the common caricature of realism that justice is “what the judge ate for breakfast” in sequential...