How to calculate Fair, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (FRAND) royalties seems like one of the most intractable problems firms, standard setting organizations and the courts are grappling with. No wonder, there is sparse authority and relatively few litigated cases.
Two of the most thoughtful scholars on antitrust intellectual property issues — Professors Mark Lemley and Carl Shapiro — have weighed in and issued a paper outlining an interesting solution to the FRAND licensing problem...
I have a Dropbox account and use it to store a lot of my cloud-based documents. Dropbox emailed its users late last week, announcing changes to its Terms of Service, including the addition of an arbitration clause. Notably, the clause included submission of disputes to the AAA for arbitration, a right to opt out within 30 days, an agreement that Dropbox will pay all arbitration fees for claims of less than $75,000, a “bonus” payment of $1,000 if the award is greater than any Dropbox offer...
The certiorari petition in Strine v. Delaware Coalition For Open Government, Inc. (seeking review of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that confidential Delaware Business Arbitration Program proceedings would be contrary to “a First Amendment right of access to Delaware’s government-sponsored arbitrations”) has been distributed to the Justices of the US Supreme Court for review at their regular conference this coming Friday (March 21, 2014). It is therefore likely...
You can agree to disagree, but can you agree to preclude a court from reviewing an arbitration award? According to David McMahon of Barger & Wolen, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals recently gave a definitive “no” to the question.
The case was Burton v. Class Counsel, and the appeal arose from multidistrict litigation relating to wage-and-hour claims against Wal-Mart; the matter settled for $85 million, McMahon says, and the parties all agreed to have a master settle any fee disputes...
The Third Edition of the College of Commercial Arbitrators Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration is now available. The expanded guide was edited by Carl Ingwalson, Vivien Shelanski, and past Disputingguest blogger James Gaitis. The newly revised guide also includes contributions from a number of College of Commercial Arbitrators fellows.
Here is a brief description of the guide:
The aim of the Guide is to identify best practices that arbitrators can employ to provide...
Is a mandatory arbitration clause that denies basic due process rights unconscionable? You would think so but think again. The doctrine of unconscionability has technical elements that must be met. Courts around the country have held that the denial of a due process right doesn’t meet the test of substantive unconscionability analysis. Is this the end of the line or is there an alternative analysis that will address the unfairness of such a provision? This article urges that a little known doctrine,...
In a summary order issued today in TiVo Inc. v. Goldwasser, the Second Circuit upheld the rejection of a manifest disregard of the law challenge. The Court lists the FAA grounds for vacatur and then states the circuit’s position that manifest disregard may be applied as “judicial gloss” on the statutory grounds. The order then devotes around six pages to a review of the petitioner’s legal arguments, finding none shows manifest disregard. The court, towards the end of the order, briefly addresses...
After years of ambiguity about the enforceability of contract clauses mandating arbitration and waiving class action rights in domestic antitrust cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has finally brought clarity to the situation. In June 2013 the court decided American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, holding that arbitration clauses and waivers of class action rights are enforceable in domestic antitrust cases.
Regardless of whether one agrees with the court's conclusion, the American Express...