Class action waivers are undergoing a renaissance following the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Wal-Mart v. Dukes and AT&T v. Concepcion. With the green light from the Supreme Court, more companies are adopting class action waivers in a wider range of circumstances.
What’s unusual about General Mills’ move is that we haven’t seen such a broad-based waiver from a consumer packaged goods company. Most consumer packaged goods companies don’t have a direct relationship with their...
The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. Strine, in which the Third Circuit struck down Delaware’s scheme allowing parties with cases before the Delaware Court of Chancery to pay an extra fee to have their matters heard by a Chancery judge sitting in the guise of an arbitrator.
The Third Circuit’s decision was based on the First Amendment right of public access to judicial proceedings. As I discussed in a previous post on the case, however, in my view...
Litigants cannot be forced to arbitrate disputes through class arbitration unless they agree to do so. This is the U.S. Supreme Court’s message delivered in two opinions addressing the enforceability of arbitration provisions and class action waivers. With these opinions, the Court signaled that the language of the arbitration agreement controls whether a case may be maintained as a class action or whether a class action is precluded.
Choose Language Carefully
The Supreme Court issued its unanimous...
An enduring issue in U.S. jurisprudence has been the difficulty of determining when a court, rather than an arbitral tribunal, should make the initial decision on whether the arbitrators have the authority to hear a dispute. Although the Supreme Court has provided general guidance on this “gateway” question in a few cases, there has been substantial room for lower court judges to fashion an array of arbitrability rulings. The tendency has been to favor the arbitrators as the first stop, drawing...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Sutter today, unanimously holding that as long as the arbitrator bases a decision to allow or disallow class arbitration on the text of the parties’ agreement, her “construction holds, however good, bad, or ugly.” Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. ___ (June 10, 2013). The case resolved a circuit split on how to interpret SCOTUS’ Stolt-Nielsen decision. It also proved me right (yahoo!). (I predicted the Court would affirm...
Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf of Nebraska isn’t afraid to criticize the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sometimes the court “can really screw things up,” Kopf writes at his blog Hercules and the Umpire. As an example, he offers the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker, which effectively made the federal sentencing guidelines advisory. “If haphazardly injecting chaos into a system is a good thing, the Supreme Court is very good at that,” Kopf writes.
But much...
At the 2012 AALS meetings Ron Aronovsky (Southwestern) organized the ADR Section’s program entitled The Supreme Court and the Future of Arbitration. Here’s a short blurb describing the program.
Over the past twenty five years, the range of disputes subject to binding arbitration – particularly as a result of pre-dispute arbitration agreements — has grown dramatically. The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a series of arbitration law decisions on such topics as the availability of class...