A federal trial court concluded that California’s strict mediation confidentiality provisions were not applicable in a bad faith claim by homeowners against their insurer, as the insurer needed to be able to show that its failure to settle the case was the result of the homeowners’ excessive demands in mediation. The court relied on the seminal California Supreme Court case, Cassel v. Superior Court, in which due process is recognized as a limit on the mediation confidentiality statute, even...
While the parties agreed that an oral settlement agreement had been reached in mediation, a Delaware court refused to enforce it because of disagreement over the scope of the release, which the court concluded was a material term. Mediation confidentiality was waived by the parties relying on mediation communications. However, statements of the mediator during the mediation were generally excluded as hearsay because the court found no applicable hearsay exception.
United Health Alliance v. United...
I approached SCMA with the idea of doing a Town Hall in 2003 when the mediation community was divided like the red sea over the Rojas v. Superior Court Case. That case pitted the confidentiality of the mediation process (and the evidence of mold discovered during a mediation, and its eventual remediation) against the needs of the families who had mold spores in their lungs and no way to prove liability, short of breaking the confidentiality of the underlying mediation. That year, SCMA and CDRC,...