In 2010, the PPACA was signed into law.[1] The PPACA was enacted with the goals of increasing the quality and affordability of health insurance, lowering the uninsured rate by expanding public and private insurance coverage, and reducing the costs of healthcare for individuals and the government.[2] The PPACA marks the first federal law to comprehensively regulate the business of insurance since the enactment of the McCarran-Ferguson Act in 1945.[3]
The first prong of the McCarran-Ferguson...
In Am. Bankers Ins. Co. v. Inman,[1] the Fifth Circuit was asked to determine whether Miss. Code Ann. § 83-11-109 (2013)[2] reverse preempts the FAA. Ultimately, the court held that Miss. Code Ann. § 83-11-109 (2013) does in fact reverse preempt the FAA.[3]
The appellant argued that Miss. Code Ann. § 83-11-109 (2013) does not reverse preempt the FAA via the McCarran-Ferguson Act.[4] Specifically, the appellant argued that Miss. Code Ann. § 83-11-109 (2013) does not “regulat[e]...
As prior discussion suggests, a mechanism for avoiding the preemptive effect of the FAA on state insurance law is found in the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which provides for reverse preemption of federal law by state insurance law in the following manner:
No Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance . . . unless such Act specifically relates to the business of insurance . . . .[1]
In...
This paper discusses the McCarran-Ferguson Act generally, the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) generally, and the reverse preemption of the FAA via the McCarran-Ferguson Act specifically. Reverse preemption of the FAA via the McCarran-Ferguson Act sounds facially confusing at the outset. In order to better understand and flesh-out reverse preemption of the FAA via the McCarran-Ferguson Act, two case studies are presented, namely: one case study finding reverse preemption of the FAA via the McCarran-Ferguson...