On April 9, the 11th Annual ITA-ASIL Conference: Mass and Class Claims in Arbitration will be presented from 12:00 noon – 4:30 p.m. in Washington D.C. at the Ronald Reagan International Trade Center.
The conference examines the competing trends and future prospects for class and mass claims in litigation and arbitration and features a keynote address by Carolyn B. Lamm (White & Case LLP, Washington, D.C.), past President of the ABA and lead advocate for the 60,000 Italian claimants in Abaclat v. Argentine...
“We all live in …” is often part of a solidarity rallying cry, like “We all live in Wisconsin” expressing unity against union busting, or “We all live in Bhopal” showing support after the devastating 1984 gas disaster. ("We all live in a Yellow Submarine" does not count!)
So today, we all live in Arbitration Land. If it takes professional dancers to make you understand that you live there too, then so be it. In this case, those dancers would be the Oakland Raider cheerleaders...
Ali Khan, Professor of Law at Washburn University School of Law, has published an interesting article entitled, Arbitral Autonomy, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2013. In his paper, Professor Khan discusses the need to minimize court challenges to arbitration in order to successfully achieve arbitral autonomy.
Here is the abstract:
This Article presents concrete proposals to amend the current arbitration law for minimizing court intervention into arbitration proceedings and enforcement...
Ali Khan, Professor of Law at Washburn University School of Law, has published an interesting article entitled, Arbitral Autonomy, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2013. In his paper, Professor Khan discusses the need to minimize court challenges to arbitration in order to successfully achieve arbitral autonomy.
Here is the abstract:
This Article presents concrete proposals to amend the current arbitration law for minimizing court intervention into arbitration proceedings and enforcement...
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Seney v. Rent-a-Center, Inc. (No. 13-1064, 4th Cir., Dec. 11. 2013) avoided deciding whether Federal agency regulatory limits on pre-dispute arbitration agreements for consumer warranty disputes, promulgated by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under the general authority of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (the “MMWA”), are consistent with US Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) pro-arbitration jurisprudence. The Court...
The Federal Arbitration Act sets forth only four bases for vacating arbitration awards. See 9 U.S.C. § 10 (a). After SCOTUS’s 2008 decision in Hall Street, at least half of the circuit courts have concluded that those four bases are exclusive, de-legitimizing the creative bases that judges had developed over the years. However, a recent Fourth Circuit opinion vacated an arbitration award for ”manifest disregard of the law,” a judicially-created basis for vacating arbitration...
The Third Circuit ruled last week that Delaware’s Chancery Court could not offer its judges’ services as neutral arbitrators in its courtrooms, unless those arbitrations were open to the public.
In 2009, the Delaware courts decided to provide arbitration. The state amended its laws to create an arbitration process that was only open to disputes worth more than a million dollars with at least one party being a business incorporated in Delaware (and no party being a consumer). The parties...