In a case that has attracted the attention of legal experts from across the country, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court of Delaware’s decision that found the confidentiality provisions of the Delaware Court of Chancery’s arbitration program unconstitutional. Applying the well-known experience and logic test, the 2–1 majority concluded that the tradition and importance of public access to proceedings like Delaware’s government-sponsored arbitration...
Tom Stipanowich called the Delaware Court of Chancery’s arbitration program “a veritable trifecta of procedural advantages for commercial parties, including expert adjudication, efficient case management and short cycle time and, above all, a proceeding cloaked in secrecy.” But he warned that its constitutionality was in doubt. Now the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has, indeed, ruled it unconstitutional. The grounds for the ruling go to some of the most profound assumptions of access...
A decision by a federal appeals court has ended Delaware’s experiment with confidential arbitration.
In an opinion released Wednesday, a three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that Delaware’s state-sponsored arbitration program violated the First Amendment.
The controversial arbitration program was established by Delaware in 2009. Delaware is the leading state for incorporations by public companies, and the five judges...
Last week, author Dan Solin, a long-time critic of FINRA, published a column in U.S. News & World Report attacking the FINRA arbitration forum as biased, unfair to investors and shrouded in secrecy. Presumably, the column was motivated by a federal judge’s recent decision to deny a FOIA request that PIABA (Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association) filed with the SEC to obtain what Solin describes as “very basic information about the way FINRA administers the arbitration process,...