The United States Supreme Court began its October 2013 term today. One of the cases the high court will consider this fall is BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, Docket No. 12-138. In the case, the District of Columbia Circuit vacated an arbitral award that was issued as a result of a Bilateral Investment Treaty (“BIT”) entered into between the United Kingdom and Argentina. The treaty itself provides that any disputes between a business investor and a host nation will be resolved in the host...
American litigators know that there is often a tortuous road between the filing of the complaint and trial. The parties’ positions, and how each side views the facts, tend to evolve through the initial pleadings, amended pleadings, motions to dismiss, documentary discovery, depositions, summary judgment motions, pretrial submissions, motions in limine, pretrial statements, trial briefs, and the course of trial itself. It is often not until after discovery is completed and summary judgment motions...
Tom Stipanowich called the Delaware Court of Chancery’s arbitration program “a veritable trifecta of procedural advantages for commercial parties, including expert adjudication, efficient case management and short cycle time and, above all, a proceeding cloaked in secrecy.” But he warned that its constitutionality was in doubt. Now the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has, indeed, ruled it unconstitutional. The grounds for the ruling go to some of the most profound assumptions of access...
Warren Knull says his first three weeks as a new corporate and securities associate with Andrews Kurth were "business boot camp" training. Knull and the firm's other baby lawyers went through a course the firm purchased called The Fullbridge Program, during which the associates formed teams to solve a case study.
"We were tasked with deciding whether or not to build from scratch an air taxi business or acquire one of the major players already in the market," says Knull, a 2013 graduate of the University...
Attorney negotiation ethics is a timeless topic as evidenced in a recent contribution from Peter Reilly (Texas A&M), Andrea, and me entitled, Attorneys and Negotiation Ethics: A Material Misunderstanding? 29 Negotiation J. 265 (2013), (on SSRN and available for download here). The paper discusses the common themes across our various empirical work on the subject, and is the result of a presentation we made at the ABA DR Section Conference a couple of years ago. Thanks to my coauthors...
Over the past 200 years, litigation in federal courts has continually changed. The greatest change has taken place in the past 25 or 30 years. During this period, we have seen the almost total disappearance of civil trials in federal court. Trials have been largely supplanted by motions practice and settlement. But lawyers have not responded to this change and still conduct pretrial as if their cases are going to trial. I think that is a mistake, and in this article I offer suggestions as to what...
Now that we know the Supreme Court is not going to be addressing non-signatories’ ability to compel arbitration this term (at least not in the Toyota case), we can take a moment to look at what lower courts are doing with that issue. In short, the trend is for courts to clarify that it is very difficult for defendants who do not have an arbitration agreement with the plaintiff (non-signatories) to use equitable estoppel to compel arbitration of the plaintiff’s claims based on the plaintiff’s...
When you get right down to it, all the data in the world doesn’t really make a difference unless you can process it. And the most effective way for people to process giant waves of data (they keep inventing new words to describe the quantity) is to see it as an image.
That seemed to be the bottom line on the panel hosted by TechAmerica Foundation for its Big Data Roadshow on Energy.
Brian Jones, a principal of SAP Energy and Utilities, moderated the panel. He explained that big data and visualization...
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released two opinions yesterday of some interest. In Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocery Company (No. 11-56673, October 28, 2013), the Court of Appeals held that the arbitration provision in an employment agreement was unenforceable because it was “procedurally unconscionable because it was a condition of applying for employment and was presented on a “take it or leave it” basis. In addition, its terms were not provided to the plaintiff until three...