Class Action Fairness Blog: Bringing Separate Actions for Different Classes is not "Gaming the System"

By Don Philbin, December 13, 2010   
This post has been viewed 2,410 times.

 

Class Action Fairness Blog: Bringing Separate Actions for Different Classes is not “Gaming the System” www.cafalawblog.com/-case-summaries-bringing-separate-actions-for-different-classes-is-not-gaming-the-system.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+cafalawblog+%28Class+Action+Fairness+Act+Blog%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Read original article


Tags: ,




Related Posts

Numbers Game Update: Are Class Actions on the Decline?
June 11, 2014

After the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011) and AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion,...


Another Settlement in Auto-Parts Antitrust Class Action
June 11, 2014

Another auto parts supplier named in a sweeping antitrust class action, Autoliv Inc., has agreed to pay $65 million to resolve...


Arbitration as a Means of Avoiding Class Actions
June 11, 2014

In AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, the Supreme Court held that a waiver of class action that was part of an arbitration clause...


 

What do you think?

Discussion is central to our goals at ADR Toolbox. If you have a minute, please share your thoughts on the article above and contribute to the conversation.





 

«
»






 
Menu Title
Bitnami