Alyson Carrel, Clinical Associate Professor and Assistant Dean of Law and Technology Initiatives at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, and Noam Ebner, Professor of Negotiation and Conflict Resolution in the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies at Creighton University, have published “Mind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation Table,” Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2019 (2), 1-45. In their journal article, the authors discuss incorporating beneficial...
Klein thinks Ex Parte’s data-driven approach will make patent litigation more efficient by giving clients a better understanding of their odds—and which lawyers will improve them most.
“We are able to develop a predictive model that can achieve what even the most experienced lawyer who has argued 20 cases in the Federal Circuit couldn’t possibly hope to achieve,” Klein, 52, said. “That is what’s happening across every other industry but has not yet made its way to the field of law.”
Some...
It is clear that all conflicts are perceived by the senses, manifested through body language and kinesthetic sensations, embodied and given meaning by thoughts and ideas, steeped in intense emotions, made conscious through awareness, and then resolved by conversations and experiences and developed into character, expanding our capacity for openness and trust, and contributing to our learning and ability to change, and that all of these transpire or are processed inside the brain.
To explain the etiology...
The Supreme Court of Texas agreed to consider whether the San Antonio River Authority must arbitrate a dispute related to the costs associated with a $10 million dam project. In San Antonio River Authority v. Austin Bridge & Road, L.P. and Hayward Baker Inc., No. 17-0905, the San Antonio River Authority (“River Authority”) entered into a construction contract to repair and stabilize the Medina Lake Dam with Austin Bridge & Road, L.P. (“Austin Bridge”) on behalf of itself...
Regulators and shareholders generally oppose any restriction on clients' rights to sue their auditors, believing that such restrictions would impair reporting quality. However, the evidence suggests that the opposition to limitation of liability agreements (LLAs) between clients and auditors is likely unwarranted. Specifically, the evidence indicates that LLAs are beneficial to clients by lowering their audit fees. More importantly, we find no evidence that they impair financial reporting quality...
On April 24, 2019 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela, 587 U.S. ___, No. 17-998 (April 24, 2019), the United States Supreme Court considered whether whether consent to class arbitration may be inferred from ambiguous contract language.
In a 5-4 opinion written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. the Court held that ambiguity in and of itself was not enough to infer party consent to class arbitration. Parties would have to clearly express their consent to class arbitration before courts could impose...
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to resolve a circuit split regarding whether a non-signatory to an agreement to arbitrate may compel arbitration under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “New York Convention”) based on the doctrine of equitable estoppel. In GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al., No. 18-1048, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals held a non-signatory...