This article concerns the dispute-resolution process that occurs in the context of Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The author argues that the Chapter 11 bankruptcy dispute system accomplishes many goals of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), and at the same time avoids many of the ideological and substantive critiques associated with ADR. Chapter 11 bankruptcy represents a process of Halting, Altering, and Agreeing that differs substantially from the classic Naming, Claiming, and Blaming dispute process.
Read original article

