The Texas Supreme Court is currently considering three cases that could drastically alter the legal landscape for owners of closely-held corporations. Each case was brought by a minority shareholder alleging that the majority shareholders had wielded their power so as to unfairly prejudice or “oppress” the minority. The minority shareholders all prevailed in front of Dallas juries on the theory of “shareholder oppression,” but then had mixed results in the Dallas Court of Appeals. The Texas...
You represent a closely held corporation. Whom do you represent—the corporation or the chief operating officer who owns all the shares?
Lawyers! No wonder ordinary mortals find us exasperating.
Lawyers get hired and paid to worry about things no one else expects to, or much less wants to, worry about. Just imagine what your client would think if you voiced these dark-of-the-night worries: “I thought you were my friend! I thought I could rely on you to solve my problems for me, not to create...
Want to make sure the clauses in your company’s latest contract measure up to current legal standards? Now, for in-house counsel, there’s a web portal for that.
The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), the global bar association for in-house counsel, has launched a new online Contracts Portal that provides in-house attorneys with tools to improve the quality of their contracts, and to assist them with contract management and negotiation.
One of the signature features of the portal,...
Florida’s economic loss rule—a state-specific rule that bars tort actions if the only damages alleged are economic—is now limited to products liability cases, a divided Florida Supreme Court held in Tiara Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Co., Inc. [PDF].
Issue Presented
Tiara came before the Florida Supreme Court on a certified question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The issue presented was whether, under Florida law, the economic loss rule,...
Alford v. Kuhlman Electric Corporation No. 11-60728
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/11/11-60728-CV0.wpd.pdf
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. (May 24, 2013).
Posted in Contract - Interpretation, Indemnity, Settlement
Affirming the District Court, the Fifth Circuit holds that the terms of a Merger Agreement and Cooperation Agreement were not incorporated into a Master Settlement Agreement. Here, the MSA's statement that "[obligor]...
In the wake of corporate bankruptcies, government bailouts, and shareholder losses resulting from the economic downturn of 2008, shareholders are increasingly turning to derivative suits in an effort to hold someone responsible for their financial losses. Corporate directors stand in a fiduciary relationship of trust and confidence with the corporation and its shareholders. As fiduciaries, corporate directors owe the corporation and its shareholders fiduciary duties of diligence and fidelity in performing...
SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc., Del. Supr., No. 314, 2012 (May 24, 2013). This Delaware Supreme Court decision was the subject of a BloombergBusinessweek article on Sunday, May 26. The Court of Chancery’s opinion was highlighted on these pages at this link. Also, several other prior Chancery decisions in this case were also outlined on these pages.
Issue Addressed: Is an agreement to negotiate in good faith in accordance with a term sheet an enforceable obligation?
Short...
This survey examines significant business torts decisions by Texas courts for the period from March 2012 through February 2013. “Business torts” obviously covers a broad spectrum, and in narrowing the survey, we included cases that either decided new issues or examined issues of particular interest to business litigators. During the survey period, Texas courts addressed: (1) the meaning of restoration under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices – Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”); (2) the circumstances...