The Indiana Supreme Court recently declared that the state’s judicial policy supports “robust confidentiality” in mediation. In doing so, the court vacated a Court of Appeals ruling that would have expanded the circumstances in which confidentiality could be broken to obtain evidence. The two rulings reflect a strong contrast in interpretations of ADR rules and judicial policy toward mediation.
As I discussed in an earlier post, the appellant wished to use evidence from his divorce...
Charles B. Craver, Freda H. Alverson Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law Schoolrecently published a thought-provoking article entitled The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques to Resolve Public Sector Bargaining Disputes, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 28, p. 45, 2013. In his article, Professor Craver examines the growing use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in public sector bargaining disagreements.
Here is the abstract:
Labor...
TyMetrix, the global leader in intelligent solutions for managing the business of law, announced today the launch of its 2013 TyMetrix Legal Analytics LegalVIEW(R) FORUM series, peer-to-peer content-driven sessions that focus on today's most pressing legal issues. The first session, "Establishing Value-Based Pricing and AFAs," will be held on February 28 at the Harvard Club, 35 West 44th Street, in New York, from noon to 6 p.m.
"These forums truly represent a first in the legal industry, bringing...
The Ninth Circuit ruled this week that a class of car owners could pursue their court claims against the manufacturer, Toyota, for product defects and false advertising, despite the existence of an arbitration agreement in each of the owners’ purchase agreements with the car dealerships. The court held that Toyota had not proven either of the types of equitable estoppel that would allow it, as a non-signatory to the purchase agreements, to enforce the agreements’ arbitration clause. Kramer...
Reinvent Law Silicon Valley is happening next Friday, March 8 at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California. The brain child of Professors Daniel Martin Katz and Renee Knake, co-founders and co-directors of the Reinvent Law Laboratory at Michigan State University Law School, the event promises to be quite a bash. The event is free, but attendance is limited to 400 participants and you have to register to get in. Over 40 innovators, founders, policymakers, venture capitalist and other...
Now that Cass Sunstein (Harvard) has departed the Obama Administration (and OIRA) and migrated back to academic life, in a recent paper published by the University of Chicago Law Review, Empirically Informed Regulation, Sunstein illustrates the central role data play (or, at least should play) in the development of regulations, with an emphasis on behavioral economics. The paper's abstract follows.
"In recent years, social scientists have been incorporating empirical findings about human behavior...
FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers issued its decision today in Dep’t of Enforcement v. Charles Schwab & Co, an enforcement action in which FINRA alleged that Schwab’s class action and joinder waiver language in its customer agreement violated FINRA rules that preserved the judicial class action remedy for investors and empowered arbitrators to consolidate non-class though similar claims. For more details about the background and the facts of the enforcement action, see my previous...
Venue is a major consideration in structuring any lawsuit. A plaintiff’s choice of venue under Texas law can, however, be disturbed if a court determines that venue in another county is in the interests of convenience and justice. This article addresses venue transfers based on convenience and justice and a recent trend in Texas decisions to limit the reviewability of such transfers.
Under Texas law, venue is proper in the county where all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving...