In the last installment of our B-2-B Arbitration series we focused on one of the most important structural aspects of pre-dispute arbitration agreements: the mutual promise to submit disputes to arbitration, what it means and how its performance by the parties through their post-dispute submission defines and delimits the scope of authority parties actually delegate—as opposed topromise to delegate—to arbitrators to resolve particular disputes.
But there are other important structural aspects...
In recent years, courts have consistently supported employers’ use of arbitration agreements in employment settings. During the last few terms, the Supreme Court of the United States has issued several decisions, such as American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant (2013) and AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepion (2011), upholding the use of arbitration agreements. Texas courts have also issued decisions, such as In re Halliburton Co. (2002), upholding the use of such agreements.
While...
In a recent case involving an unsuccessful aquatic ecosystem restoration project in Clearwater, Florida, the Middle District of Florida applied the Federal Arbitration Act to resolve an arbitrability dispute, which involved a marine and dredging construction company, its performance bond sureties, and a dredging contractor. First granting a motion to compel arbitration with respect to the construction company and the contractor, both of which had signed the arbitration agreement, the court then reviewed...
Allegations of fraud and corruption are increasingly encountered in international arbitrations but there is at times a perception that international arbitration, which is by nature a private and consensual dispute resolution mechanism, is ill-equipped to handle the challenges thrown up by such allegations. This is particularly so when looking at arbitral procedure. Is this perception justified or is international arbitration flexible enough a tool to overcome these challenges?
Is a dispute concerning...
Faced with a question of first impression, the Ninth Circuit recently held that a clause in an arbitration agreement that eliminates any and all federal court review of arbitration awards, including review under § 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act, is unenforeceable. The Court reasoned that allowing parties to “contractually eliminate all judicial review of arbitration awards . . . run[s] counter to the text of the FAA,” and “would also frustrate Congress’s attempt to ensure a minimum level...
The last two segments of this Small Business B-2-B Arbitration series have focused on certain key structural aspects of pre-dispute arbitration agreements. Perhaps some might think that an examination of even the most basic structural components of arbitration agreements is too much information for a business person, but most successful business people know about all relevant aspects of the contracts they negotiate, not just the basic structural components of those contracts (e.g., price and performance...
Applying California law, the Northern District of Texas stated a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement “may invoke an arbitration clause to compel a signatory plaintiff to arbitrate its claims when the causes of action against the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the underlying contract obligations.” The court continued,
When a nonsignatory seeks to enforce an arbitration clause, the doctrine of equitable estoppel applies in two circumstances: (1) “when the signatory...
Ali Khan, Professor of Law at Washburn University School of Law, has published an interesting article entitled, Arbitral Autonomy, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2013. In his paper, Professor Khan discusses the need to minimize court challenges to arbitration in order to successfully achieve arbitral autonomy.
Here is the abstract:
This Article presents concrete proposals to amend the current arbitration law for minimizing court intervention into arbitration proceedings and enforcement...