Disputing: Partnership for Patients Initiative Launched
May 6, 2011

Disputing: Partnership for Patients Initiative Launched http://www.karlbayer.com/blog/?p=13344

Disputing: S.D. of Texas Confirms Foreign Arbitration Award Where Fraud Was Alleged
May 5, 2011

Disputing: S.D. of Texas Confirms Foreign Arbitration Award Where Fraud Was Alleged http://www.karlbayer.com/blog/?p=13423

Disputing: Texarkana COA Upholds MSA Where Mediator Resolved Dispute Regarding Scope
May 4, 2011

Disputing: Texarkana COA Upholds MSA Where Mediator Resolved Dispute Regarding Scope http://www.karlbayer.com/blog/?p=13374

CPR Institute: CPR Announces the 2011 Relaunch of its National Panel of Distinguished Neutrals
May 3, 2011

CPR Institute: CPR Announces the 2011 Relaunch of its National Panel of Distinguished Neutrals http://www.cpradr.org/Default.aspx?&gv1252__gvac=2&tabid=92&gv1252__gvff4=TX&gv1252__gvfl4=4 ["CPR’s Panels of Distinguished Neutrals comprise the most highly qualified mediators and arbitrators from throughout the world. They include prominent attorneys, retired state and federal judges, business executives, legal experts, academics, and ADR professionals who are particularly well...

Disputing: Dallas COA Refuses to Compel Non-Signatory to Arbitration
May 3, 2011

Disputing: Dallas COA Refuses to Compel Non-Signatory to Arbitration http://www.karlbayer.com/blog/?p=13361

ADR Times: Case Note: Facebook v. ConnectU
May 1, 2011

ADR Times: Case Note: Facebook v. ConnectU http://www.adrtimes.com/articles/2011/4/21/case-note-facebook-vs-connectu.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ADR-Times-Articles+%28ADR+Times+%2F+Articles%29

CPR Institute: The Reaction to AT&T Mobility–Are Class Actions Next?
April 29, 2011

CPR Institute: The Reaction to AT&T Mobility--Are Class Actions Next? http://www.cpradr.org/Resources/ALLCPRArticles/tabid/265/ID/711/Day-2-The-Reaction-to-ATT-Mobility-Are-Class-Actions-Next-April-28.aspx

ADR Prof Blog: Sternlight on AT&T v. Concepcion [Sternlight: "the majority has obscured the real issues at play: whether companies can use class action prohibitions to entirely protect themselves from claims in small cases and in cases where many victims may not realize their rights have been compromised. . . . I am hopeful that advocates and lower courts may find some ways to limit Concepcion to its somewhat unusual facts, and allow consumers and others to continue to challenge future class action prohibitions using unconscionability arguments."]
April 28, 2011

ADR Prof Blog: Sternlight on AT&T v. Concepcion [Sternlight: "the majority has obscured the real issues at play:  whether companies can use class action prohibitions to entirely protect themselves from claims in small cases and in cases where many victims may not realize their rights have been compromised. . . . I am hopeful that advocates and lower courts may find some ways to limit Concepcion to its somewhat unusual facts, and allow consumers and others to continue to challenge future class...

ADR Prof Blog: Impact of Concepcion on Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards
April 28, 2011

ADR Prof Blog: Impact of Concepcion on Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards http://www.indisputably.org/?p=2318

ADR Prof Blog: Continuing the Discussion of the AT&T v. Concepcion Decision: Implications for the future [Cole: "As Paul suggests, every lawyer representing a business should tell the business to insert class action arbitration waivers immediately (if not sooner)."]
April 28, 2011

ADR Prof Blog: Continuing the Discussion of the AT&T v. Concepcion Decision: Implications for the future [Cole: "As Paul suggests, every lawyer representing a business should tell the business to insert class action arbitration waivers immediately (if not sooner)."] http://www.indisputably.org/?p=2312