The holidays are a series of negotiations. Where do we spend the holiday? Who will join us? Whose family recipe will be used for dinner? Most importantly, who will be present? Will my feelings be hurt? Will I hurt feelings? And, why is so and so always so loud or, alternatively, so quiet?
So, what tips will help you through the holidays? It’s the stuff that mediators and hostage negotiators do every day. Listen. Really listen. Actively listen. Or, as one former F.B.I. hostage negotiator...
Stories reminds us, graphically, that it is the parties who are supposed to be at the center of the process. It also demonstrates that it is the parties who often can be the sources of the most valuable and, sometimes, crucial contributions to the viability of the process. It is the parties, after all, who best understand themselves. They know what they think, feel and need. And sometimes it is the parties who best understand one another – who most accurately identify the agendas, needs, and goals...
This is the final installment in Disputing‘s series focused on sections of a research paper entitled, “Arbitration in Evolution: Current Practices and Perspectives of Experienced Arbitrators,” by Pepperdine University School of Law Professor Thomas Stipanowich and Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution Research Fellow Zachary Ulrich. The article fully analyzes the data obtained in a groundbreaking 2013 survey regarding commercial arbitration practice in U.S. and international disputes.
This...
As soon as a party is served with a summons and complaint and sometimes sooner, there arises a duty to preserve evidence, including electronically stored information (ESI). This duty requires both counsel and clients to comply with any litigation hold and monitor ongoing compliance efforts.
Because spoliation – withholding or hiding evidence – goes to the heart of the litigation process and is not unlike perjury, failing to comply with the duty to preserve has serious consequences. Judges...
I have never been a great fan of mediator’s proposals. I took the view that the mediator’s job, done well, was to help the parties to come to a solution themselves. Party autonomy and all that. Achieving a satisfactory outcome, I thought, shouldn’t require a specific suggestion by the mediator.
I have changed my view. As usual, experience is a great teacher. As is improvisation. Here’s what happened. After several hours of to-ing and fro-ing, and with a still significant gap between them,...
In a previous post, I shared Professor Stacie Strong’s call for blog readers to respond to her survey on international commercial mediation practice. Thank you to everyone you did.
While the final results are still pending, Prof Strong has released some preliminary results from the study.
The study, which is entitled “Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation: A Preliminary Report on Issues Relating to the Proposed UNCITRAL Convention on International Commercial...
OK, so in Part One we all agreed that we need to give people a better choice than the one between a system of civil litigation that does a great job of permitting appeals, but is perceived to be, or is, too cumbersome or expensive to resolve disputes; and a system of arbitration that, one hopes, is cheaper, but does not permit, at least the judicial appeal that parties might wish to have available if the arbitrator gets it “wrong.”
So what is the better choice? We’ll start by explaining...
Wouldn’t it be great if at your next mediation your client left satisfied, you felt valued and the case settled at its best number? Here are five tools lawyers can use to set up such an outcome:
1. Bring everything you need to settle completely. Before the mediation, think about what you will need to settle the case in its entirety. Perhaps it is a document, such as a settlement agreement, release of lien, escrow instructions, quitclaim deed or dismissal with prejudice. Maybe it’s your...