Texas Supreme Court: Intent to avoid child support need not be proven for the trial court to apply the child support guidelines to earning potential instead of actual earnings.
By Don Philbin, April 19, 2011
This post has been viewed 2,850 times.
This post has been viewed 2,850 times.
Texas Supreme Court: Intent to avoid child support need not be proven for the trial court to apply the child support guidelines to earning potential instead of actual earnings. However, a trial court may properly consider an obligor’s intent to avoid child support as a factor in an intentional unemployment or underemployment analysis. http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/2011/apr/090753.htm
Read original articleTags: Employment
Related Posts
The Economist on the Affect of Technology on Employment – Including Law
February 16, 2014
This article from The Economist surveys the opinions of several economists on the impact of technology on employment in the near...
February 16, 2014
This article from The Economist surveys the opinions of several economists on the impact of technology on employment in the near...
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Enforced Settlement Agreement in Title VII Case
December 4, 2012
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Enforced Settlement Agreement in Title VII Case http://goo.gl/5MWcB
December 4, 2012
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Enforced Settlement Agreement in Title VII Case http://goo.gl/5MWcB
Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Privacy Claims Based on Facebook Firing: Roberts v. Careflite
October 18, 2012
Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Privacy Claims Based on Facebook Firing: Roberts v. Careflite...
October 18, 2012
Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Privacy Claims Based on Facebook Firing: Roberts v. Careflite...
