Comment, Arbitration – United States Supreme Court Sounds Death Knell for Class Arbitration – Stolt Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Int’l Corp., 130 S. Ct. 1758 (2010)
By , February 8, 2012
This post has been viewed 1,542 times.
The author argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Stolt Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Int’l Corp., a case vacating an arbitration award in a class-action suit where neither side’s arbitration agreement included class arbitration because the arbitration in this case was coercive, undermines arbiters’ authority to resolve class disputes while failing to clarify the scope of the holding or the type of language required to consent to class arbitration.
