Dispensing Injustice: Stolt-Nielsen and Its Implications
By Nicholas Goodrich, February 8, 2012
This post has been viewed 1,882 times.
This article discusses the implications of the Supreme Court’s holding in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., particularly focusing on potential effects of the case in the consumer context. The article argues that Congress should enact the Arbitration Fairness Act in response to concerns that an extension of the Stolt-Nielsen holding would allow corporations to enjoy immunity in consumer disputes.
